Is having a genius IQ a prerequisite to be the next Einstein

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around feelings of inadequacy and frustration regarding academic performance and recognition. The original poster expresses disappointment in not achieving the desired class rank despite hard work, feeling overshadowed by peers who seem to excel with less effort. They question whether a high IQ is necessary for success in physics, particularly in relation to aspirations of winning a Nobel Prize. The conversation highlights that genius is not a prerequisite for success in science; rather, hard work and perseverance are crucial. Participants emphasize the importance of focusing on personal growth and academic achievements rather than comparing oneself to others. They encourage exploring various career paths in science beyond prestigious accolades, suggesting that true fulfillment comes from passion and dedication rather than external validation. The discussion also touches on the evolving nature of physics and the potential for new discoveries, countering the notion that the field is reaching a dead end. Overall, the thread underscores the value of resilience, self-acceptance, and the pursuit of knowledge as key components of success in academia and beyond.
  • #51
We are obviously not capable of giving any advice that passes the test. I'll abstain from deducing how incredibly ridiculous this is.
BlunderingGod said:
I guess I'm too genius or too mentally retarded for people to understand me. I'm taking the former.
If you are what you think you are, we will hear from you. I'm not convinced that this will happen. I think enough has been said.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213, bhobba, hmmm27 and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Good catch on an internet TROLL fresh.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and Dr Transport

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
12K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
32
Views
7K
Back
Top