What Distinguishes the t=0 Singularity from a Black Hole Singularity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the distinctions between the t=0 singularity associated with the Big Bang and singularities found within black holes. Participants explore theoretical implications, potential models, and the nature of singularities in general, touching on concepts from general relativity and quantum gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how the t=0 singularity can be fundamentally different from black hole singularities, suggesting that the former exhibits behaviors not observed in the latter, possibly due to quantum repulsive forces.
  • Others propose that certain theories suggest phenomena similar to the t=0 singularity could occur within black holes, including the idea of another universe existing inside a spinning black hole.
  • A participant introduces the holographic principle, likening the projection of information at a black hole's event horizon to the nature of our universe as a 3-dimensional projection of 2-dimensional information.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the factual basis of both t=0 and black hole singularities, indicating that they are mathematical constructs that highlight limitations in current cosmological models.
  • Another participant notes that singularities represent points where existing models fail, suggesting a need for new theoretical frameworks.
  • There is mention of quantum gravity models, such as Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and Horava gravity, which propose that singularities may resolve into quantum bounces, although uncertainty remains regarding their implications for black holes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and implications of singularities, with no consensus reached on whether t=0 singularities and black hole singularities are fundamentally the same or different. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing theories and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current models and the mathematical nature of singularities, indicating that these concepts may depend on specific theoretical frameworks and definitions that are not universally accepted.

ugalpha
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I just don't see how they can be the same, if singulariity t=0 eventually went all berserk (due to quantum repulsive force perhaps) or whatever other reason like it actually did why is it not happening inside of black holes?
 
Space news on Phys.org


I believe there are certain theories that say this IS happening inside black holes. Or at least, GR does not forbid the existence of another universe within the confines of a spinning black hole.

This leads to all sorts of neat ideas, i.e. the holographic projection of information at the event horizon boundary could be analogized to say that WE are the 3 dimensional projected image of 2-dimensional information at the boundary of OUR universe.
 


Nice you just messed up my brain even more with this idea. Gonna go sleep and dream about this holographic projection.

ty sir!
 


Your question implies the existence of a T=0 singularity and black hole singularities, both of which have no factual basis. As far as I can tell from reading PF, singularities are predicted mathematically but are widely believed to be the result of problems with our cosmo models and related math. All of which makes answering your question pretty dang hard...
 


A singularity identifies the point where all our models cease to yield sensible results. That is sufficient motivation to seek new models.
 


But singualrities are resolved into a quanurtm bounce in many quantum gravity models. Main one being LQG but also I think Horava gravity. I read Martin Bojowalds book and its pretty clear to me what they are saying for the big bang. But I still want sure what is supposed tgo be happeneing in balck holes with these models. Bojowald didnt seem keen on CNS in his book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K