What do Professors recommend for Full textbook study?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Professors often skip chapters in textbooks during courses due to time constraints and the assumption that students possess foundational knowledge. For instance, in courses like algebra-based Physics 2 and General Chemistry 2, professors prioritize essential topics while omitting advanced or niche subjects that are covered in subsequent courses, such as Organic Chemistry. This approach allows professors to focus on core concepts relevant to the course, rather than overwhelming students with material that may not be immediately applicable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of course structures in higher education
  • Familiarity with textbook organization and content hierarchy
  • Knowledge of foundational concepts in subjects like Physics and Chemistry
  • Awareness of the curriculum design in academic programs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the curriculum design principles in higher education
  • Explore the role of prerequisite knowledge in course selection
  • Investigate the impact of textbook structure on learning outcomes
  • Examine teaching strategies used in STEM subjects
USEFUL FOR

Students in higher education, particularly those studying STEM subjects, educators designing course curricula, and academic advisors guiding students through their educational paths.

BioCore
Hi,

I guess this is a question that is directed more towards any of the Professors here at the forums, although anyone with advice is more than welcome to. I always wondered why Professors would only cover certain chapters from the textbook.

Although I know that time is one of the limiting factors in teaching the whole book, my question specifically relates to the courses in which the Professors begin teaching from some chapters in the middle or later chapters. Such as Chapter 6+ and skip the introductory parts or the final advanced parts.

Do Professors expect that students already know the information and so they skip through, and for more advanced topics, are these same topics covered in other courses or is it another reason? Also, would any Professors recommend that a student who might have the time, actually go through the whole book if they enjoy the course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not a professor (Senior at UMBC) but here's my take on this.

There usually too much in a textbook for an entire semester. And often times a lot of the jettisoned material is derivative, meaning if they teach you A, then they maybe expect you to understand B somewhat.

I have taken algebra based Physics 2 for biology majors. I noticed that professor was skipping around quite a bit, throwing out sections that would pertain to only future physics students. Same thing with chemistry. When I took general chemistry 2, there section within a chapter about organic chemistry. But our professor said that although it was important, he was not going to cover it because for that there's Organic chemistry 1 & 2. In organic chemistry, none of us really understood how an NMR spectrometer worked. That was for the physicists! We faked through the physics part of it, and for the most part we stuck to the basics.

So I don't think profs want to focus their attention on niche topics (which are important) but not of immediate importance. From personal experience I've noticed Chemistry & Physics and math professors don't skip all over the place, but biology teachers are very likely to do this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
742
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K