What do you call this method of proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 314Jason
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying the method of proof used to demonstrate relationships in triangle ABC as variable n changes. The user successfully applies mathematical induction to show that the length of BC decreases as n increases, and seeks to understand the terminology for this approach. Participants suggest using geometric and analytical arguments, emphasizing the importance of trigonometric relationships between angles and lengths. The conversation highlights the necessity of careful application of induction when dealing with angles defined over the reals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Mathematical induction
  • Trigonometry
  • Geometric proofs
  • Real analysis concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study geometric proof techniques in triangle properties
  • Explore trigonometric relationships in triangle ABC
  • Learn about real analysis and its application in proofs
  • Investigate advanced methods of proof beyond induction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of geometry, and anyone interested in advanced proof techniques and the relationships between angles and lengths in triangles.

314Jason
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove a statement using as many different methods as posible. I heard long ago that this is a type of proof, but I don't know what to call it!

For example: In a triangle ABC denoted by (equation with variable n), as n increases, the length of BC decreases.

So I've used mathematical/full induction to show how the distance decreases. Now I want to also show that as n increase the angle BAC decreases. And if angle BAC decreases, using logic, the length of BC must decrease as well.

And same goes for the area. I've proved that when n increases the area of triangle ABC decreases, which corresponds to the decreasing length of BC.

What do I call this type of proof? Is it analytical proof? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well normally when you are using n as an argument and showing it is true for all n in the natural numbers greater than k starting from some particular natural number k, you are doing a proof by induction. However, in your case it seems to me that you are relating n with an angle in some way. Since the angle is defined over the reals mod 2pi, you would need to be careful about trying to use induction to prove this. I would say try to use geometric and analysis arguments to prove your statements. You know how to relate angles to lengths using trigonometry, and so you have bounds on these lengths. You could show how the lengths change as a function of the angle and try to show what happens when the angle approaches some value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K