What do you think consciousness is?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Consciousness
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complex nature of consciousness, with participants sharing diverse perspectives on its definition and implications. Key points include the idea that consciousness validates existence and is linked to awareness of one's environment, which can extend beyond humans to simpler life forms. Some argue that consciousness involves not just reaction to stimuli but also the capacity for memory and self-awareness, distinguishing it from mere automatic responses seen in plants and lower organisms. The debate touches on whether consciousness is a uniquely human trait or if it exists in varying degrees across species, with references to animal behavior and even plant responses. The conversation also explores philosophical dimensions, questioning the meaningfulness of defining consciousness and the relationship between consciousness, sentience, and self-awareness. Participants express skepticism about equating reaction with consciousness and discuss the role of memory in conscious experience. Overall, the thread highlights the ongoing inquiry into what consciousness truly is and how it manifests across different forms of life.
  • #121
Hmmm

sage said:
to radar. impressive link. shows how quantum effects can exist in synaptic transmissions and hence in the development of consciousness.but still the explanation is completely physical . the fact that brain uses quantum effects is hardly surprising as we know that exploitation of quantum phenomenon can greatly increase the effeciency of computers and our brain is nothing but the most powerful parallel processor ever built. but no matter how sophisticated the technology(whether silicon based or carbon based) all processors are still turing machines in essence and rely on algorithms for information processing.nothing metaphysical about this.

Sage, its Rader not radar. This thread has been dead for ages but since you dug it up. Sounds like you would be interested in AI. Yes quantum effects in the brain, only becase we are investigating the brain. Is not everything only quantum effects, when we examine them? Its all based on QM are you saying that it is not, highly abstract or theoretical. You must believe then that computers can become conscious? I do too, but not for the same reason.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
to rader-"Its all based on QM are you saying that it is not, highly abstract or theoretical".
sorry for mispelling your name. having difficulty comprehending what you are saying especially in the sentence above. please clarify a little bit before i hazard a reply.
p.s-i seemed to have given you a curt reply stating what you are saying was unscientific. sorry for that.
 
  • #123
quantum biology

What I am saying is that QM is highly abstract and theoretical but has usefull verifiable applications. Here its used to discuss the casual efficacious appeance of consiousness in the brain. I think it can help to solve the unaskable question, how biological processes in the human body somehow know how to do exactly what they have to, instantaneously. There is nothing physical in QM just probabilites or superpositions of states until the V vector collapses. One change in the state of the V vector locally, affects all others non-locally. This is why or maybe how all biological processes are controlled in the entire body automatically. Please pay no attention to my non-linear thinking, it was just a thought for the moment.
 
  • #124
i define a phenomenon as physical if it conforms to the laws of physics. in that sense the explanation offered is physical as quantum effects have been considered. it is only when the metaphysical ideas are bandied about to explain something that i begin to see red. otherwise new ideas will always be welcome.
 
  • #125
sage said:
i define a phenomenon as physical if it conforms to the laws of physics. in that sense the explanation offered is physical as quantum effects have been considered. it is only when the metaphysical ideas are bandied about to explain something that i begin to see red. otherwise new ideas will always be welcome.
Hi Sage,

Consciousness is overview.
Overview by an individual.
Individual overview is always limited and very narrow.

Overview is based on the data the individual receives:
(1) from his sensors,
(2) from his body,
(3) from his experiences in his past (personal knowledge) stored in the brain,
(4) from learned knowledge stored in the brain (knowledge collected by others),
(5) from genetic information embedded in his complete body (and not just in his brain microtubulines),
(6) from hidden events in his surrounding (i.e. radiation, food),
(7) from his location in spacetime (i.e. effect of gravity, non-local information).

All these effects or parameters influence the perception of what the individual is conscious about. How he sees his "reality".

So try to combine all these parameters in one system that is constant dynamic and where all those elements are constantly interconnected and interacting.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
23K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K