Is Engineering of Gravity and Time a Groundbreaking Theory?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper titled "Engineering of Gravity and Time," which proposes a theory linking gravity and time to rotational dynamics. The paper attempts to address fundamental questions, such as the disparity in strength between gravity and other fundamental forces. Despite some intriguing concepts, the validity of the paper is questioned, particularly regarding its interpretation of Newtonian physics and relativity. The discussion concludes with a dismissal of the paper as lacking credible sources and relevance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian physics and gravitational theory
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Basic knowledge of rotational dynamics
  • Ability to critically evaluate scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of rotational dynamics in physics
  • Study the differences between Newtonian gravity and Einstein's general relativity
  • Explore experimental methods in gravitational research
  • Examine peer-reviewed sources for credible scientific theories
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in gravitational studies, and anyone interested in the theoretical underpinnings of gravity and time.

John Luis
I have recently read a paper called "Engineering of Gravity and Time" for an undergraduate student. It contains a theory of gravity and time depending on rotation.
Well.., I think it looks quiet percussive. However, fairly, it contains some worthwhile ideas, especially it answers some elementary questions that current theories can not such as "why is gravity much weaker than other forces?". It recommends an experiment at the end too.
So.., I wish you read it and tell me what you think, please.

Available at
<< Link removed.>>

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
Hornbein said:
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.

This is true with respect to his theory "rotation" because Earth rotates but the apple does not ( Eq. 1). However, false with respect to relativity.
 
The link given is not to an acceptable source as per PF rules.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
Why do we spend so little time learning grammar in college?
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
5K
Graduate Does Gravity Criticism in Maxwell's Equations Apply to All Gravity-Medium Analogies?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Is there some agreement on properties of a theory of quantum gravity?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Witten’s paper: "A Note On The Canonical Formalism for Gravity" LQG
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Undergrad Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Undergrad Can Newtonian Gravity be Thought of as a Theory of Curved Time?
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Graduate Clarification regarding argument in EPR paper
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Undergrad Can Core Theory Be Derived From Nine Lines?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Are there issues with Conformal Gravity as a DM solution?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K