Undergrad What Does a Negative Value for the Deceleration Parameter Imply in Cosmology?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A negative value for the deceleration parameter, denoted as ##q(t_0)##, indicates an accelerating universe, as observed in cosmological data. The deceleration parameter is defined mathematically as ##q(t_0) \doteq -\frac{a''(t_0)}{a(t_0) H^2(t_0)}##, where ##H(t_0)## is the Hubble constant. Consequently, a negative ##q(t_0)## implies that the term ##\left[- \frac{1}{2} q(t_0) H^2(t_0) (t-t_0)^2\right]## becomes positive, suggesting that the expansion of the universe is accelerating rather than decelerating.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological parameters, specifically the Hubble constant and deceleration parameter.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions in the context of cosmological models.
  • Basic knowledge of differential calculus as it applies to cosmological functions.
  • Awareness of observational data in cosmology that indicates the universe's expansion behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of a negative deceleration parameter on cosmic expansion models.
  • Study the relationship between the Hubble constant and the deceleration parameter in cosmology.
  • Explore observational techniques used to measure cosmological parameters, including supernova observations.
  • Investigate the role of dark energy in influencing the deceleration parameter and cosmic acceleration.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the implications of cosmological parameters.

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
TL;DR
Understanding the definition
I note the general Taylor series for ##a(t)## as:

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

a(t)&\approx a(t_0) + a'(t_0) (t-t_0) + \frac{1}{2!} a''(t_0) (t-t_0)^2 ...

\end{split}

\end{equation}
which I rewrite as:

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

a(t)&\approx a(t_0)\left(1 + \frac{a'(t_0)}{a(t_0)} (t-t_0) + \frac{1}{2} \frac{a''(t_0)}{a(t_0)} (t-t_0)^2 + ... \right)

\end{split}

\end{equation}
In this context, the Hubble constant ##H(t_0)## is defined as follows:

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

H(t_0) &\doteq \frac{a'(t_0)}{a(t_0)}

\end{split}

\end{equation}
and the deceleration parameter ##q(t_0)## is defined as follows:

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

q(t_0)&\doteq -\frac{a''(t_0)}{a(t_0) H^2(t_0)}

\end{split}

\end{equation}
such that

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

a(t)&\approx a(t_0)\left(1 + H(t_0) (t-t_0) - \frac{1}{2} q(t_0) H^2(t_0) (t-t_0)^2 + ... \right)

\end{split}

\end{equation}

My question: Does a negative value for ##q(t_0)##, which is what is observed in the data, therefore imply that the term ##\left[- \frac{1}{2} q(t_0) H^2(t_0) (t-t_0)^2\right]## is positive?
 
Space news on Phys.org
It seems that way yes
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K