I What does a "phase reversal" really do?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmlee1324
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Phase reversals in thin film interference occur when light waves reflect off surfaces with different refractive indices, leading to a 180-degree phase change for certain reflections. This phase difference is crucial because it can result in constructive or destructive interference when multiple light rays combine. Even though the period of light is extremely fast, small phase differences can lead to significant visual effects, such as cancellation of light in specific areas. The interaction of light rays at the retina or detection instruments means that phase must be considered, as it influences the overall intensity and visibility of the resulting light pattern. Understanding these interactions is essential for analyzing thin film interference phenomena.
cmlee1324
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
While learning about thin film interference, I see diagrams quite often that display waves being inverted. For instance, a wave that bounces off outside the film is inverted because it is going from air to film (lower to higher index of refraction) while a wave that bounces INSIDE the film is not inverted (higher to lower index of refraction). This got me thinking.

Why do phase "reversals" (what my teacher calls a phase change of 180 I think) matter? If light is still in the same location at the same angle, why does the phase matter? Does light appear different when it has a different phase? If the period of light is so ridiculously fast, why would a nanosecond difference in phase appear different?

If this question makes no sense from the view of someone with more knowledge on the subject, may I request a very basic explanation of waves and how they interact with thin films and an eye?
 
Science news on Phys.org
A phase shift of 180 degrees is not visible, but if we have two superimposed rays of light having opposite phase then we will find cancellation.
 
So the only purpose of taking phase into account is to see if there is any destructive interference?

If so, why would that be necessary when talking about thin film interference? I would assume that there are no interactions between the rays; they glance off into infinity.

Do the rays interact? Is that the reason why 1 vs 2 phase reversals gives different equations for constructive and destructive interference? (m or m+1/2)
 
cmlee1324 said:
So the only purpose of taking phase into account is to see if there is any destructive interference?
Yes, pretty much. At least in a general interpretation. Although it's "interference" not just destructive interference.

cmlee1324 said:
If so, why would that be necessary when talking about thin film interference? I would assume that there are no interactions between the rays; they glance off into infinity.
Some may go different places. But some paths meet at a cell on your retina, or the photocell in your instrument. At that point the response they create is the result of addition, in which case phase can be really important. Like adding two vectors up, direction matters. Same with light.
 
  • Like
Likes cmlee1324 and hutchphd
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...
Back
Top