I What does a "phase reversal" really do?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmlee1324
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Phase reversals in thin film interference occur when light waves reflect off surfaces with different refractive indices, leading to a 180-degree phase change for certain reflections. This phase difference is crucial because it can result in constructive or destructive interference when multiple light rays combine. Even though the period of light is extremely fast, small phase differences can lead to significant visual effects, such as cancellation of light in specific areas. The interaction of light rays at the retina or detection instruments means that phase must be considered, as it influences the overall intensity and visibility of the resulting light pattern. Understanding these interactions is essential for analyzing thin film interference phenomena.
cmlee1324
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
While learning about thin film interference, I see diagrams quite often that display waves being inverted. For instance, a wave that bounces off outside the film is inverted because it is going from air to film (lower to higher index of refraction) while a wave that bounces INSIDE the film is not inverted (higher to lower index of refraction). This got me thinking.

Why do phase "reversals" (what my teacher calls a phase change of 180 I think) matter? If light is still in the same location at the same angle, why does the phase matter? Does light appear different when it has a different phase? If the period of light is so ridiculously fast, why would a nanosecond difference in phase appear different?

If this question makes no sense from the view of someone with more knowledge on the subject, may I request a very basic explanation of waves and how they interact with thin films and an eye?
 
Science news on Phys.org
A phase shift of 180 degrees is not visible, but if we have two superimposed rays of light having opposite phase then we will find cancellation.
 
So the only purpose of taking phase into account is to see if there is any destructive interference?

If so, why would that be necessary when talking about thin film interference? I would assume that there are no interactions between the rays; they glance off into infinity.

Do the rays interact? Is that the reason why 1 vs 2 phase reversals gives different equations for constructive and destructive interference? (m or m+1/2)
 
cmlee1324 said:
So the only purpose of taking phase into account is to see if there is any destructive interference?
Yes, pretty much. At least in a general interpretation. Although it's "interference" not just destructive interference.

cmlee1324 said:
If so, why would that be necessary when talking about thin film interference? I would assume that there are no interactions between the rays; they glance off into infinity.
Some may go different places. But some paths meet at a cell on your retina, or the photocell in your instrument. At that point the response they create is the result of addition, in which case phase can be really important. Like adding two vectors up, direction matters. Same with light.
 
  • Like
Likes cmlee1324 and hutchphd
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top