What Does Audible Mean in the USDOC Radio Frequency Allocation Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Good4you
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rf
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The USDOC Radio Frequency allocation table designates certain frequencies as "Audible," which has sparked confusion due to the fundamental differences between electromagnetic waves and audible sound waves. The discussion clarifies that while radio waves (10-10kHz) are electromagnetic, they can be converted to audible sound through devices like speakers. Techniques such as using a long wire connected to a laptop's mic port can effectively receive Very Low Frequency (VLF) signals, allowing users to hear atmospheric sounds like whistlers and the dawn chorus. This highlights the intersection of radio frequency technology and audio perception.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic waves and sound waves
  • Familiarity with radio frequency (RF) concepts
  • Knowledge of Very Low Frequency (VLF) signals
  • Basic electronics skills for building simple receivers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for building a VLF receiver using a laptop and microphone input
  • Explore the phenomenon of atmospheric radio signals such as whistlers and the dawn chorus
  • Learn about the conversion of electromagnetic signals to audio frequencies
  • Investigate the impact of electromagnetic interference (EMI) on radio signal reception
USEFUL FOR

Radio enthusiasts, audio engineers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of radio frequency technology and atmospheric sound phenomena.

Good4you
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
USDOC Radio Frequency allocation table (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/2003-allochrt.pdf)
lists part of the radio spectrum as "Audible." Radio waves are electromagnetic (e.g. light), while audible waves are pressure waves in a medium (e.g. air.) They travel at very different speeds, and are very different things. We see one and hear the other (depending on the frequency.) An audible RF signal makes absolutely no sense to me. I wouldn't think a government document would get basic science so blatantly wrong, so i think i may be missing something here. If I Google "Audible VLF", there are a lot of hits on the subject. They seem to talk about something like receiving radio frequencies from lightning strikes, and playing them as audio. Or hearing buzzing in electrical lines. Neither scenario i would interpret as being an audible radio wave.

What do you suppose the allocation chart is trying to say? Is it just wrong? Or perhaps correct, but misleading? Or am i completely missing something?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's just EM at frequencies from 10 -10kHz, plus or minus whatever definition you choose for audio frequencies. Different media obviously.
 
Agreed. An oscillator producing an EM frequency in that range could be heard audibly if you connected to a speaker. The speaker just does the translating from EM to waves of pressure by design. VLF signals are pretty easy to translate to audio since they occupy those frequencies already. I've heard of some folks just taking a really long wire and plugging it into the mic port on a laptop. If you crank the gain up high enough, you essentially create a basic VLF receiver. Ideally, you'd want around 150 meter-long wire for VLF though, but you could probably pick up some interesting sounds with something shorter around dawn or dusk if you're outside away from heavy EMI. HF bands and below tend to be pretty noisy in crowded areas these days.
 
abram said:
I've heard of some folks just taking a really long wire and plugging it into the mic port on a laptop. If you crank the gain up high enough, you essentially create a basic VLF receiver. Ideally, you'd want around 150 meter-long wire for VLF though, but you could probably pick up some interesting sounds with something shorter around dawn or dusk if you're outside away from heavy EMI. HF bands and below tend to be pretty noisy in crowded areas these days

Yup a lot of fun listening to various atmospherics ... Dawn Chorus, Whistlers etc

Dave
 
Most likely this can only be answered by an "old timer". I am making measurements on an uA709 op amp (metal can). I would like to calculate the frequency rolloff curves (I can measure them). I assume the compensation is via the miller effect. To do the calculations I would need to know the gain of the transistors and the effective resistance seen at the compensation terminals, not including the values I put there. Anyone know those values?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K