What Does d Represent in Calculus and Physics Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AznBoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Symbol
Click For Summary
The symbol "d" in calculus and physics represents an infinitesimal change, indicating the limit of a change as it approaches zero. In the context of current, the expression I = dq/dt signifies the instantaneous rate of change of charge with respect to time, as opposed to average current calculated over a finite interval. While "d" is often associated with change, it should not be treated as a standalone quantity; rather, it represents the operation of differentiation. The derivative is defined rigorously through limits, which allows for precise calculations of rates of change. Understanding "d" is essential for grasping the concepts of calculus and its applications in physics.
AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
What does the symbol "d" mean??

I've seen the symbol "d" many times and in a physics lecture. For example: the professor would write: I = \frac {dq}{dt} instead of: I = \frac {Q}{t} I think I've also seen it in calculus equations such as derivatives and such. I'm only in Pre-calculus so I haven't not yet gone over anything related to calculus. But I'm interested in finding out what the "d" means in the formulas. Thanks. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"d" means change... in the limit that the change is infinitestimal. in your particular exapmle: I=Q/t really means "average" current because that's total change in charge over total change in time: in fact it means
I_{av.}=\frac{\delta Q}{\delta t}=\frac{Q_f-Q_i}{t_f-t_i}, now when in the limit of very small change... ie. \delta t \rightarrow 0 this becomes \frac{dQ}{dt}, the advantage of this quantity is that you can now specify "I" at any instance.

anyway, calculus means two things in essence: chop things up into small bits or adding small bits togeter.
 
mjsd said:
"d" means change... in the limit that the change is infinitestimal. in your particular exapmle: I=Q/t really means "average" current because that's total change in charge over total change in time: in fact it means
I_{av.}=\frac{\delta Q}{\delta t}=\frac{Q_f-Q_i}{t_f-t_i}, now when in the limit of very small change... ie. \delta t \rightarrow 0 this becomes \frac{dQ}{dt}, the advantage of this quantity is that you can now specify "I" at any instance.

anyway, calculus means two things in essence: chop things up into small bits or adding small bits togeter.

Oh ok, I knew it was related to delta \Delta thanks!
 
Yikes, this is not the best way of learning what dq/dt means.

Note that an "infinitesimal change" as a quantity is NOT a well-defined term mathematically. Mjsd's comment about calculus is good as a conceptual way to look at things only. Therefore, although physicists do it all the time, dq and dt really shouldn't be treated as quantities, and dq/dt shouldn't be treated as a ratio. It is the limit of a sequence of such ratios:

\frac{dq}{dt} = \lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{\Delta q}{\Delta t} = \lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{q(t + \Delta t) - q(t)}{(t + \Delta t) - t}​

To reiterate: the derivative of the function q(t) is given by the limit as \Delta t \rightarrow 0 of the above sequence of ratios. A limit IS a well-defined concept in mathematics, and you will learn what it means when you take calculus. It is used to define a derivative rigorously and formally. As a result, d shouldn't be thought of as a symbol, if you want to be mathematically proper. Instead, \frac{d}{dt} should be thought of as a symbol that represents the operation of differentiation. When this d/dt acts on a function, the operation of differentiation with respect to time is carried out on that function to produce the first dervative of the function with respect to time.

\frac{d}{dt}q(t) = i(t)​

In this example, the derivative of the function, denoted by dq/dt, represents the instantaneous rate of change of q(t) (i.e. the instantaneous current, as opposed to the average current over some finite time interval).
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K