What Does Dominate Mean for Quantum Effects at the Planck Length?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the Planck length and the implications of quantum effects at this scale. Participants explore the meaning of "dominate" in relation to quantum effects compared to other scales, such as that of electrons, and the potential need for Quantum Gravity. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and interpretations of time and space at the Planck scale.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the term "dominate" implies that quantum effects are the only phenomena at the Planck length, and whether these effects are stronger than those observed at larger scales, such as with electrons.
  • Others argue that quantum effects are significant at scales above the Planck length, particularly in the context of atomic and electron behavior.
  • A participant suggests that the Planck length represents a unique interaction between space and time, proposing that time is defined by the duration it takes for a photon to traverse this length.
  • Another participant raises questions about the nature of time dilation and its geometric representation, asking whether it should be considered as a solid line or a path.
  • One participant notes that Planck units are merely a convenient system of measurement and questions their significance in broader contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of quantum effects at the Planck length, with no consensus reached regarding the significance of these effects compared to other scales or the interpretation of time and space interactions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of time and space at the Planck scale, the nature of quantum effects, and the significance of Planck units. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions that are not universally accepted.

Freeman Dyson
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
"The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and space-time cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. This is the ‘quantum of length’, the smallest measurement of length with any meaning."

What I am wondering about this description is the word "dominate". Does this mean quantum effects are all there is at this level? Would Quantum Gravity be needed? Does this mean quantum effects "dominate" more at the the Planck scale than they do, on say, the electron? Do quantum effects on the electron get downgraded to something like "significant"? So the Planck length is where quantum effects are the strongest and they get a little weaker as we move up the scale from this starting point?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not right. Where did that quote come from?
 
Freeman Dyson said:
Does this mean quantum effects "dominate" more at the the Planck scale than they do, on say, the electron? Do quantum effects on the electron get downgraded to something like "significant"?.

The quote is talking about quantum effects in the description of spacetime, not about quantum effects in general. Quantum effects, of course, are important well above the plank scale in the understanding of atoms, electrons etc.
 
"The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and space-time cease to be valid,

Planck length is where space and time interact one on one, time is defined as the length in seconds that a photon takes to cross one Planck length. We still have to measure the photon's motion to get time, but time is not one dimensional motion, energy is. Time dilates as an expanding area in all directions it is the motion we measure that gives us a direction, time gives us the possible directions.
 
petm1 said:
time is defined as the length in seconds that a photon takes to cross one Planck length.

Do you think this is a solid line i.e. does the photon occupy the entire line segment, or like a bit the line segment is a path?

If time dilates in every direction would the area of time for this measurement be R^3 as in a sphere or because it is a photon would it be a cone?
 
petm1 said:
Planck length is where space and time interact one on one, time is defined as the length in seconds that a photon takes to cross one Planck length. We still have to measure the photon's motion to get time, but time is not one dimensional motion, energy is. Time dilates as an expanding area in all directions it is the motion we measure that gives us a direction, time gives us the possible directions.

Planck length is where space and time interact one on one, time is defined as the length in seconds that a photon takes to cross one Planck length.

Where can I find more about this?
 
Planck units are just another set of units that are convenient in some circumstances. If you see the links on the bottom of this page (or use the search function), you can see this has come up again and again. They don't have any special significance, at least not one that's generally accepted.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Graduate Gravity Measured with Milligram masses
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Graduate Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Quantum properties and Van Hove singularty
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
420
Undergrad The photoelectric effect: What frequency does υₛ refer to in the work function?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Graduate What if Planck Constant is Zero? Effects in Quantum Explored
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Calculating the Planck Length
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Graduate About role of Planck constant in classical physics
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate What Happens When the Universe is Reduced to the Planck Length?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Does an electron have a quantum phase frequency?
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K