What Does Feynman Mean by the Heat Energy in Springs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Richard Feynman's explanation of heat energy in springs, particularly the behavior of atoms within a spring during energy conversion. It is established that in an ideal scenario, a spring operates as a perpetual machine, but real-world applications involve atomic movement that leads to energy loss as heat. The conversation highlights that when a spring is stretched and released, the conversion of kinetic energy into heat occurs due to the random movement of atoms rather than uniform stretching or contracting. This understanding clarifies why discussions often focus on kinetic energy conversion to heat in springs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of potential and kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of atomic behavior in materials
  • Basic grasp of Feynman's principles in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of thermodynamics in greater detail
  • Study the atomic structure and behavior in materials under stress
  • Research the concept of energy conversion in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the implications of energy loss in real-world applications of springs
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the thermodynamic properties of materials and energy conversion processes.

Aleoa
Messages
128
Reaction score
5
In an ideal reversible case, a spring is a simple perpetual machine ; in order to introduce the slowdown of a spring in a real case and the consequent heat development in the spring, Feynman writes (here par. 4.4):

"Inside a spring or a lever there are crystals which are made up of lots of atoms,
and with great care and delicacy in the arrangement of the parts one can try to
adjust things so that as something rolls on something else, none of the atoms do
any jiggling at all"

I don't understand what Feynman means with this sentence. Can you help me ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
If there were no jiggling, there would be no conversion of kinetic energy of the rolling object into random kinetic energy in that object and/or in the something else it is rolling on. In a spring this would not be rolling but e.g. wringing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa
BvU said:
If there were no jiggling, there would be no conversion of kinetic energy of the rolling object into random kinetic energy in that object and/or in the something else it is rolling on. In a spring this would not be rolling but e.g. wringing.

Suppose we stretch and the release a spring with no weight connected. If I've understood correctly, the conversion of kinetic energy is due to the atoms that, instead of stretching and contracting, start to move in random ways . Am i correct ?

ps: since in a spring there is both potential energy and kinect energy, why do we speak only about "conversion of kinetic energy into heat energy " ?
 
Aleoa said:
ps: since in a spring there is both potential energy and kinect energy, why do we speak only about "conversion of kinetic energy into heat energy " ?
When potential energy is converted to heat in a spring, it is usually first converted to kinetic energy.

I suppose that one could convert potential energy directly to heat if a compressed steel spring rusted away to nothing without breaking first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa
jbriggs444 said:
I suppose that one could convert potential energy directly to heat if a compressed steel spring rusted away to nothing without breaking first.
Interesting thought. I guess anything that would reduce the spring constant while it was extended would also work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Aleoa said:
Suppose we stretch and the release a spring with no weight connected. If I've understood correctly, the conversion of kinetic energy is due to the atoms that, instead of stretching and contracting, start to move in random ways . Am i correct ?
 
The atoms do not stretch and contract. They shift relative to one another. But they do not shift simultaneously and smoothly as a continuous whole. So yes. In addition to the bulk shift of position, there is energy lost into random wiggles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K