What does it mean to connect something to a potential V?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter carllacan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of connecting a spherical shell to a potential V0, exploring the implications of this connection in terms of electric fields, charge distributions, and the relationship between potential and displacement fields. Participants engage with theoretical aspects, mathematical reasoning, and conceptual clarifications related to electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that connecting a spherical shell to a potential V0 involves "pumping" charges until an electric field is established, but expresses uncertainty about calculating the electric field from this potential.
  • Another participant clarifies that achieving a potential V0 can be done through various means, such as connecting to a power supply or using a capacitor, and emphasizes the complexity of these methods.
  • A participant notes the challenge of calculating the displacement field D without knowledge of the polarization or free charges present, indicating a need to relate potential to free charges first.
  • Discussion includes a reference to the electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell, with a suggestion to use Poisson's equation to find the potential outside the shell and derive the charge distribution.
  • One participant expresses a plan to use Poisson's equation to find the potential outside the shell and equate it to the potential produced by a charge density on the shell, questioning whether they can disregard V0 after determining the charge density.
  • Another participant points out that the initial description of the situation was incomplete, specifically regarding the interior of the shell, and provides a formula for the potential outside the shell based on charge Q and radius R.
  • It is noted that the electric field inside a closed conducting shell is zero, suggesting that there is no need to consider polarization charges in that region.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of connecting the shell to a potential V0, particularly regarding the calculation of electric fields and charge distributions. There is no consensus on how to approach the problem fully, and multiple competing perspectives are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding, such as the need for additional information about the interior of the shell and the relationship between potential and charge distributions. The discussion reflects uncertainty in the mathematical steps required to connect these concepts.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Hi.

I know how to work with potentials and how to solve problems involving them, but what exactly does it mean that we connect something (say, a spherical shell) to a potential V0? What is "actually" happening?

My guess is charges are "pumped" from some source to the material until an electric field in the radial direction is created such that the potential difference between the shell and infinity is V0. But if I were asked to calculate the expression for that electric field I would be at a loss, since I can't use E = -∇V.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what exactly does it mean that we connect something (say, a spherical shell) to a potential V0? What is "actually" happening?
Physically it means that we arrange for the potential in the positions occupied by the shell to have the stated potential ... this could be done by hooking it to the positive terminal of a power supply or by putting it inside a carefully designed capacitor or some other means. The actual methods can be arbitrarily complicated. We put it like that because we don't want you to get distracted by the details of the means used to achieve that.
I were asked to calculate the expression for that electric field I would be at a loss, since I can't use E = -∇V.
Why not?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: carllacan
Sorry, I actually meant to say I couldn't get the displacement field D.

The only way to obtain it is to know the polarization of the dielectric or the free charges inside, and in this case I know neither, so I don't know how to go from the potential to D, unless I somehow go first from the potential to the free charges.
 
Note: The polarization comes in response to an electric field - what is the electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell?

You can calculate the potential everywhere outside the shell - from there you get the free charge distribution on the shell.
It may help to consider Poisson's equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: carllacan
Simon Bridge said:
Note: The polarization comes in response to an electric field - what is the electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell?

You can calculate the potential everywhere outside the shell - from there you get the free charge distribution on the shell.
It may help to consider Poisson's equation.

Oh, that sounds really good. I had thought of using Poisson (or image charges) to find V outside the shell, but not to get the actual charge distribution.

Let me check if I have it right: I need to find V(r) outside the shell using Poisson (or image charges) and then equate it to the V'(r) that would be produced by a charge density σ in the shell. Once I have that I can get σ and then I can "forget" about the potential V0 and do the rest as if I had been given σ from the beginning. What troubles me is: can I really forget about V0? Have I, by means of getting σ, accounted for all the ways it interacts with the dielectric?

Thank you for your time, I really appreciate your help.
 
You issue is more that you have not properly described the situation ... you started just by saying that a conducting shell is connected to a potential V0.
i.e. ##V(R)-V(\infty) = V_0## where R is the radius of the shell. You never said anything about what was inside the shell.

No need to solve the DE - it's been done for you many times: For a spherical shell charge Q and radius R, the potential is given by:
##V(r>R)=Q/4\pi\epsilon_0 r##

Given ##V(R)=V_0## and ##r=R##, solve for Q:
##Q=4\pi\epsilon_0 RV_0##

Note: The electric field inside a closed conducting shell is zero - so there is no reason to find any polarization charges there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K