What does the 0-ket in this state function expression represent?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the "0-ket" or vacuum state in the context of a quantum mechanical expression involving state functions. Participants explore the implications of this expression, particularly in relation to its time dependence and the validity of its formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of the "0-ket" in the expression $$\Psi(x,t) = \int d^3x $$ and its implications for quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the expression, noting a lack of time dependence on the right-hand side, which contrasts with the left-hand side's explicit time variable.
  • A later reply acknowledges a typo in the original expression but does not provide a corrected version or reference.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of providing valid references for expressions used in discussions, indicating that the provided expression does not match standard formulations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the expression or its interpretation. Disagreement exists regarding the correctness of the formulation and the necessity of references.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of a clear reference for the expression discussed, potential miscommunication regarding the formulation, and unresolved questions about the time dependence of the expression.

davidge
Messages
553
Reaction score
21
I would like to know what the "0-ket", called vacuum state and used in the following expression, represents $$\Psi(x,t) = \int d^3x <x| \ a^{\dagger}(x) \ |0>$$ I have rewritten the expression for the case of just one ##x##. The expression above is usually presented with ##(x_1,...x_n)## (n particles), in which case we have to integrate over each ##x_i##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davidge said:
the following expression

Where are you getting this expression from? It doesn't look right, since there is a dependence on ##t## on the LHS but nothing on the RHS has anything to do with ##t##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidge
PeterDonis said:
Where are you getting this expression from? It doesn't look right, since there is a dependence on ##t## on the LHS but nothing on the RHS has anything to do with ##t##.
Sorry, it was a typo. The expression as I saw it, is find below. I have it in my QM-folder. As I got it long time ago, I will not be able to tell you where I got it from.
9RLveJa.png
 
davidge said:
As I got it long time ago, I will not be able to tell you where I got it from.

Sorry, without a valid reference, I have no way of responding, except to say that what's in your QM folder still doesn't look quite right (nor does it look the same, for the case of one dimension, as what you wrote in the OP). This is why we ask for references to textbooks and peer-reviewed papers directly, not something you might have gotten from it at some time but can't remember, and apparently miscopied something when you wrote it down.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K