What does the absence of any immune response symptoms mean?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris Miller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Response
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of an absence of immune response symptoms in individuals who test positive for infections, particularly Covid-19. Participants explore the mechanisms of the immune system, the nature of asymptomatic infections, and the potential for underlying conditions that may influence symptom presentation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the absence of symptoms may indicate that the adaptive immune system effectively recognized and responded to the pathogen before a strong innate immune response could occur.
  • Others propose that asymptomatic individuals might have low levels of the pathogen, allowing their bodies to clear it without triggering noticeable symptoms.
  • A participant raises the question of how immune systems learn to recognize viruses, particularly in children who test positive for Covid-19 without symptoms.
  • Some participants mention the concept of "happy hypoxia," where individuals may have low oxygen levels without experiencing distress, suggesting that not all asymptomatic cases are entirely symptom-free.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for blood tests to differentiate between immune responses and the implications of testing asymptomatic individuals for better understanding of exposure and infection rates.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the cost and practicality of widespread antibody testing as a means to gather data on immune responses and vaccination rates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms behind asymptomatic infections and the implications of immune responses. There is no clear consensus on the reasons for the absence of symptoms or the best methods for understanding these cases.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of pathogen-host interactions and the limitations of current testing methods in accurately capturing immune responses in asymptomatic individuals.

Chris Miller
Messages
371
Reaction score
35
It's my (limited) understanding that your immune systems responds to most (all?) microbial threats initially with aches and fever, i.e., that these initial symptoms are not caused by the microbe but by your immune system's activation. So what does it mean if one is infected and infectious but never experiences any symptoms?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Your immune system has two main strategies: innate and adaptive. The innate immune system is a general inflammatory response to objects it recognizes to be foreign. This is the origin of aches, fever, etc. Your adaptive immune system is the pathogen-specific response elicited when your body recognizes an invader which it has seen before. If you’re asymptomatic, it generally means your adaptive immune system was able to recognize and fight off the invader before the invader elicited a strong innate immune response which would cause symptoms. Or at least the levels of pathogen in your system remain low enough for your body to clear it before symptoms (which would kick in if the invader were allowed to multiply unchecked).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, Chris Miller and berkeman
Thanks @TeethWhitener for the informative response. Two grandkids (and a couple of their friends) all tested positive for Covid, but none had any symptoms at all. I wonder where their immune systems learned to recognize the virus.
 
Chris Miller said:
Thanks @TeethWhitener for the informative response. Two grandkids (and a couple of their friends) all tested positive for Covid, but none had any symptoms at all. I wonder where their immune systems learned to recognize the virus.
It very well could be that the virus (for whatever reason) was slow enough in multiplying that the adaptive immune system was able to generate its response (antibodies, killer cells, etc) before the virus got to a level sufficient to cause a high degree of inflammation (aches, fevers, etc). Pathogen-host or microbe-host interactions are wildly complex.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and Chris Miller
There are other common cold Coronavirus viruses that are similar and may contribute to immune response. It does not appear to be a major driver for asymptomatic cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint, Chris Miller and TeethWhitener
Chris Miller said:
Thanks @TeethWhitener for the informative response. Two grandkids (and a couple of their friends) all tested positive for Covid, but none had any symptoms at all. I wonder where their immune systems learned to recognize the virus.
It's possible they had symptoms, but didn't recognize them. IIRC there was an asymptomatic case (ie. she felt fine) who had an abnormal chest x-ray.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener
@atyy, I've also heard of "happy hypoxia." People with very low O2 levels (like < 60%) but not under any duress. Not sure all 4 kids would feel nothing, no aches or pains or fatigue. Couldn't a simple blood test tell whether it was the adaptive or innate immune system (or neither) that fought off the virus. Wouldn't testing all asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic cases shed some light on the epidemic, as in who's been exposed before (or been misdiagnosed)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Chris Miller said:
Wouldn't testing all asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic cases shed some light on the epidemic, as in who's been exposed before (or been misdiagnosed)?
Yes. It would also cost a fortune.
 
Happy hypoxics are sick, make no mistake. Kind of an unfortunate moniker. SpO2 levels below 94%-95%, depending on who is interpreting, are not considered normal. Pulse oximeters can directly measure hypoxemia.

Happy hypoxics may have SpO2 levels below 90%. What it means is the patient can breathe and speak normally. For a while. Not gasping for air. My understanding: it is taken to mean that hypoxia will probably follow. There are various levels of clinical manifestations or "levels" of Covid disease process. Some physicians view the HH population as usually beginning the descent into more problems.

Here is why --
Simply put: hypoxemia refers to low oxygen content in the blood, and hypoxia means low oxygen supply in bodily tissues. The two are not identical and are defined this way to clarify diagnosis and causation. Hypoxemia untreated leads to hypoxia -- simplified a bit for this discussion. Want more? Look up cyanide or (CO) Carbon Monoxide. Hypoxia exists there without any hypoxemia.

Caveat: My right index finger gives false lows with a pulse oximeter. Finger got mangled in a lawn mower and does not play the game according to the rules. When every other finger reads normally, it shows pulse rate of 30 and SpO2 readings of ~90% and lower. So pulse oximeter readings have limits and require reality checks. I guess my gimped finger is a happy hypoxic... :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and Chris Miller
  • #10
TeethWhitener said:
Yes. It would also cost a fortune.
What bout the pandemic hasn't? Are the antibody tests more expensive than PCR? Sorry, no clue. I just googled, and got $38 for Covid-19 antibody testing at CVS.
 
  • #11
Chris Miller said:
What bout the pandemic hasn't? Are the antibody tests more expensive than PCR? Sorry, no clue. I just googled, and got $38 for Covid-19 antibody testing at CVS.
It depends on what one is using it for. The UK does antibody tests for surveillance. They sample blood donors (a biased sample), and they also do random sampling. One interesting application is to estimate vaccination rates and infection rates (for the vaccines available in the UK, infection can be distinguished from vaccination as the antibodies produced are different). The UK knows how many people are vaccinated, but they don't know how many people are in the country, and therefore don't know how many are unvaccinated. Their most commonly published estimate for of 93% two-dose vaccination coverage in the elderly uses the NIMS database, which overestimates the UK population, and therefore underestimates the vaccination rate. The NIMS database is useful for medical communication as it contains all the addresses that people may be at, but people may be at more than one address if they moved without informing a local authority. If the ONS database is used, vaccination coverage exceeds 100%, a clear overestimate. The ONS also has a separate method from random serosurveillance which gives an estimate of 98% vaccination coverage in the elderly.

UK blood donor antibody prevalence (p67-70): https://assets.publishing.service.g...000373/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w27.pdf

NIMS vaccination rate estimate (p71, Table 9): https://assets.publishing.service.g...000373/Weekly_Flu_and_COVID-19_report_w27.pdf

ONS serosurveillance vaccination rate estimate (Figure 3): https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...ntibodyandvaccinationdatafortheuk/4august2021
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K