What Does the Equation PV=C(1+i)^n Represent?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Frizz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Hi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation PV=C(1+i)^n, with participants exploring its meaning and relevance in physics and economics. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and potential applications of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Frizz expresses curiosity about the equation and seeks clarification on its meaning, noting a lack of recent engagement with physics.
  • Some participants suggest that the equation relates to present value in engineering economics.
  • One participant draws a comparison to the Ideal Gas Law, although others argue that the connection is tenuous and that present value is a more likely interpretation.
  • Another participant points out that the equation resembles the Future Value formula, providing a breakdown of its components.
  • There is a discussion about whether the equation pertains to physics, with mixed opinions on its classification.
  • Frizz acknowledges the closest relation to the Future Value formula but notes the absence of the 'C' in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the equation's classification as either a physics or economics concept, with multiple competing views remaining regarding its interpretation and relevance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of the equation's components and their relevance to the fields of physics and economics. There are unresolved questions about the correct interpretation of the terms used in the equation.

Frizz
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Im new to this forum, just saying hi and am curious about something.

Although I done physics at school I haven't dabbled for a number of years now...Anyway, some friends and I were having a dicussion on various topics until physics popped up (2 of them are rather heavy into it). They wrote an equation down and asked if I new what it was...PV=C(1+i)n

I know I've seen it before but can't for the life of me remember it...Can anyone please help?

Physics has sortof peeked my interest again after 17 years so am curious as to what this equation is.

I know this is a maths forum but just thought you guys could help.

Thanks

Frizz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, why not ask in the General Physics forum?
 
He's already asked the same question in about 4 forums and got an answer in one but he keeps on posting the question! Here's a clue for Frizz: Post a question only once and be responsible enough to check back. :)
 
The only reason I posted it twice...not four times, was because the answer I got in the other forum wasn't sufficient...I've tried looking it up myself but can't find it anywhere.

Am getting very curious about it now & am wondering wheather me mates wrote it down right.

Thx anyway.
 
It looks like a calculation for the present value in engineering economics.
 
Maybe...

I really don't recognise this type, but the first thing came up to my mind was the "Ideal Gas Law" ------> pV=nRT

P:Pressure
V:Volume
n:number of moles
R:universal gas constant
T:Temperature
https://www.physicsforums.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only thing it has in common with the Ideal gas law is the term PV, put this could just as well be Present Value. When you consider the RHS, Present Value seems a much more likely choice.
 
Actuall, it is close to the Future Value formula. If PV were actually FV (Future formula) then the fomula for the future value is:

FV = C(1+i)^n

where
C = current value
i = interest as decimal (i.e. 10% is .10)
n = number of interest compounding periods (i.e. years).

Note that (1+i) is reaised to the nth power, not multiplied
 
Then it appears that this isn't physics, ya?

Zz.
 
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
Then it appears that this isn't physics, ya?

Zz.

I hope so because I'm not sure what's going on.
 
  • #11
ZapperZ said:
Then it appears that this isn't physics, ya?

Zz.

Sure it is physics -- everything is just physics when you break it down far enough :)
 
  • #12
Thx

Thx for all your help guys. The closest I've come to it is FV=PV(1+i)n something to do with economics. Although it doesn't have the 'C' in it, it's the only thing that comes close.

Thx again

Frizz
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K