What Does the Notation l.l Represent in Norm Contexts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gauss mouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
gauss mouse
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
If you look here http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/RiezsLemma.html , there seems to be something missing - nothing is said about the norm of (x_alpha) or about the norm of (s - x_alpha).

Now, the same thing seems to happen here http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CompactnessOfClosedUnitBallInNormedSpaces.html , so I guess there's something about the notation that I'm not getting, rather than there being something actually missing.

Can anyone help? To be honest, I fail to see how "lx_alphal and ls-x_alphal for every s in S" could be a statement.

NB: The notation l.l is used to denote norm on the quoted webpages, rather than the more usual ll.ll
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(Riesz Lemma). Fix 0 < [itex]\alpha[/itex] < 1. If S[itex]\subset[/itex] E is a proper closed subspace of a
Banach space E then one can find x[itex]_{\alpha}[/itex] [itex]\in[/itex] X with ||x[itex]_{\alpha}[/itex]|| = 1 and |s - x| [itex]\geq[/itex]  [itex]\alpha[/itex], for all s [itex]\in[/itex] S