I What does the output of a radio telescope look like?

Click For Summary
The output of a radio telescope is typically a plot of signal amplitude versus frequency, rather than a visual image like optical telescopes. Radio emissions are often illustrated using contour plots to represent signal magnitude. Observations are recorded over time, with the signal voltage digitized for later analysis, resembling a temperature reading from the antenna and receiver. Accurate radio images are synthesized by using multiple antennas to capture the same area of the sky, which are then synchronized and correlated to produce an image. For transient objects, either single or multiple telescopes can measure signal intensity variations, allowing for real-time audio representations of phenomena like pulsars.
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
What does the output of a radio telescope look like?
I suppose it is not an image like that of a telescope observing visible light
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Typically a plot of signal amplitude as a function of frequency. So a baseline with a peak, very similar to what a spectrum in any frequency domain looks like.

Often the images of a radio emitting region will be illustrated via contour lines depicting the signal magnitude. As an example from NRAO: Viewing a contour plot.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes accdd, PeroK and berkeman
accdd said:
What does the output of a radio telescope look like?
The observation is recorded over a period of time.
The bandwidth of the signal is determined by the antenna and receiver selectivity.
The signal voltage is digitized, so it can be analyzed later using signal processing.
In effect, the antenna and receiver is a thermometer and the signal represents a temperature.
The signal sounds like frying white noise.
With an antenna aperture over about 500 m², the brightest pulsar can be heard in real time in the noise.

Accurate radio images are synthesized by recording the same area of sky, with many widely spaced antennas and receivers, simultaneously as the Earth rotates. The recorded signals are later synchronized, then correlated to produce the image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-long-baseline_interferometry
 
  • Like
Likes accdd, Ibix and PeroK
Radio astronomical data comes in several forms. For observing spectral lines, for example the well-known hydrogen 21 cm line, the output of the telescope is processed in a spectrometer to produce a spectrum of the kind you have seen before, and can usually be obtained with a single radio dish.

For sensitive observations of the ‘continuum’ emission of radio galaxies, we would normally use many telescopes joined together to form an interferometer, or an array. The data from all of these individual telescopes is joined together in some complexicated electronics (technically called a correlator), where we see the ‘interference pattern’ of the sky image as viewed by the telescope signals when they are brought together. Technically the array of telescopes are measuring the Fourier transform of the sky image, where the instantaneous 'Fourier componebts' are the interactions between the signals of the various telescopes when they are joined together. Then with a simple bit of data processing (an inverse Fourier transform), and a few other tricks, we recover the sky distribution, which is what you see looking like a radio image of the sky.

For observations of transient objects, for example the Sun, or Jupiter, or pulsars, wither an array, or a single telescope can be used, that measures the signal intensity variations, in a similar way to the spectroscopic case above, but in this case [probably] with a broader receiving bandwidth. In the early days of pulsar discovery, this signal would often be fed directly into an audio amplifier, where you could hear the click-click-click of pulsars as they entered the field of view.
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
990
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
449
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
495
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K