What does the output of a radio telescope look like?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of the output from radio telescopes, contrasting it with optical telescopes and exploring various forms of data representation. Participants delve into the technical aspects of signal processing, data formats, and the methods used to synthesize images from radio astronomical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the output of a radio telescope is typically a plot of signal amplitude versus frequency, resembling a spectrum.
  • Others describe the use of contour plots to illustrate radio emissions, indicating that these plots represent signal magnitude.
  • It is noted that radio observations are recorded over time, with the bandwidth determined by the antenna and receiver selectivity, and that the signal is digitized for later analysis.
  • One participant likens the antenna and receiver to a thermometer, suggesting that the signal represents a temperature, and mentions the auditory characteristics of the signal as resembling frying white noise.
  • Another participant explains that accurate radio images are synthesized using multiple antennas and receivers, which record signals simultaneously as the Earth rotates, and that these signals are later synchronized and correlated.
  • Discussion includes the processing of data from spectral lines, such as the hydrogen 21 cm line, and the use of interferometers for continuum emissions from radio galaxies, highlighting the complexity of the electronics involved in combining data from multiple telescopes.
  • Some participants mention the historical context of pulsar discovery, noting that signals were once amplified for auditory observation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various perspectives on the output of radio telescopes, with no consensus reached on a singular description or method of representation. Multiple competing views on the nature of the data and its processing remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the technical details of signal processing, the specific methods of data synthesis, or the implications of different observational techniques. There are also assumptions about the audience's familiarity with concepts like Fourier transforms and interferometry that are not explicitly defined.

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
What does the output of a radio telescope look like?
I suppose it is not an image like that of a telescope observing visible light
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Typically a plot of signal amplitude as a function of frequency. So a baseline with a peak, very similar to what a spectrum in any frequency domain looks like.

Often the images of a radio emitting region will be illustrated via contour lines depicting the signal magnitude. As an example from NRAO: Viewing a contour plot.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: accdd, PeroK and berkeman
accdd said:
What does the output of a radio telescope look like?
The observation is recorded over a period of time.
The bandwidth of the signal is determined by the antenna and receiver selectivity.
The signal voltage is digitized, so it can be analyzed later using signal processing.
In effect, the antenna and receiver is a thermometer and the signal represents a temperature.
The signal sounds like frying white noise.
With an antenna aperture over about 500 m², the brightest pulsar can be heard in real time in the noise.

Accurate radio images are synthesized by recording the same area of sky, with many widely spaced antennas and receivers, simultaneously as the Earth rotates. The recorded signals are later synchronized, then correlated to produce the image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-long-baseline_interferometry
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: accdd, Ibix and PeroK
Radio astronomical data comes in several forms. For observing spectral lines, for example the well-known hydrogen 21 cm line, the output of the telescope is processed in a spectrometer to produce a spectrum of the kind you have seen before, and can usually be obtained with a single radio dish.

For sensitive observations of the ‘continuum’ emission of radio galaxies, we would normally use many telescopes joined together to form an interferometer, or an array. The data from all of these individual telescopes is joined together in some complexicated electronics (technically called a correlator), where we see the ‘interference pattern’ of the sky image as viewed by the telescope signals when they are brought together. Technically the array of telescopes are measuring the Fourier transform of the sky image, where the instantaneous 'Fourier componebts' are the interactions between the signals of the various telescopes when they are joined together. Then with a simple bit of data processing (an inverse Fourier transform), and a few other tricks, we recover the sky distribution, which is what you see looking like a radio image of the sky.

For observations of transient objects, for example the Sun, or Jupiter, or pulsars, wither an array, or a single telescope can be used, that measures the signal intensity variations, in a similar way to the spectroscopic case above, but in this case [probably] with a broader receiving bandwidth. In the early days of pulsar discovery, this signal would often be fed directly into an audio amplifier, where you could hear the click-click-click of pulsars as they entered the field of view.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K