What does this derivative notation mean in Goldstein's Classical Mech?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In the book "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein, there is the following snippet

By a well-known theorem of vector analysis, a necessary and sufficient condition that the work ##W_{12}##, be independent of the physical path taken by the particle is that ##\vec{F}## be the gradient of some scalar function of position

$$\vec{F}=-\nabla V(\vec{r})\tag{1.16}$$

where ##V## is called the potential, or potential energy. The existence of ##V## can be inferred intuitively by a simply argument. If ##W_{12}## is independent of the path of integration between the end points 1 and 2, it should be possible to express ##W_{12}## as the change in a quantity that depends only upon the positions of the endpoints. The quantity may be designated ##-V##, so that for a differential path length we have the relation
Relevant Equations
$$\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{s}=-dV$$

or

$$F_s=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$

which is equivalent to 1.16.
My question is simply about the notation used here.

What does

$$F_s=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$

mean exactly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force component in the direction of the path = minus directional derivative of potential in the path direction.
 
Ok, then this is how I have understood it using notation I am more familiar with.

We have a function ##V(\vec{r})##.

Let ##\hat{v}## denote the unit velocity vector at ##\vec{r}##.

Then, the directional derivative of ##V## at ##\vec{r}## in the direction of ##\hat{v}## is

$$V'(\vec{r};\hat{v})=\nabla V(\vec{r})\cdot\hat{v}=-\vec{F}\cdot \hat{v}=-F_s$$

$$F_s=-V'(\vec{r};\hat{v})=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top