What Does "Weight x Density" Equal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonjour
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between weight, density, mass, and volume. Participants clarify that weight multiplied by density does not yield a specific physical quantity, but rather emphasizes the relationship between mass and volume through density. Key definitions are established: mass is a property of matter, while volume is a measure of space occupied. The conversation also touches on concepts like dark matter and energy, reinforcing that mass is a fundamental property of matter, distinct from volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as mass, volume, and density.
  • Familiarity with Einstein's equation E=mc² and its implications.
  • Knowledge of the properties of matter, including dark matter and dark energy.
  • Basic comprehension of scientific terminology related to physical properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical relationship between mass, volume, and density using specific examples.
  • Explore the implications of Einstein's equation E=mc² in various physical contexts.
  • Investigate the properties and differences between dark matter and dark energy.
  • Study the fundamental principles of classical mechanics to better understand mass and volume.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of matter and the relationships between mass, volume, and density.

  • #31
DaveC426913 said:
If you took a mass M and converted it to energy, the amount of energy you would get is Mc^2.

Urm. E=mc^2 is not a conversion equation but an equivalence. If it where, it would be E+mc^2=0 though there are endless authors that do this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Phrak said:
Urm. E=mc^2 is not a conversion equation but an equivalence. If it where, it would be E+mc^2=0 though there are endless authors that do this...
Can you elaborate?
 
  • #33
DaveC426913 said:
Can you elaborate?

Well, I'm not sure how to elaborate. In your first statement you say they are equivalent which is consistent with E=mc2.

But I hear this statement about converting mass to energy often enough in various forms. This isn't consistent with E/m=c2=constant where m is the ponderable, inertial mass. So the energy and mass are there all along.

In an atomic reaction, the energy doesn't change to mass, but some of the binding energy that was there all along becomes kinetic.

Interesting factoids:
The exact statement "mass energy conversion" gets 401,000 google hits.
Searching strictly on site domains .edu obtains 24,000 hits.

There are a number from hits from Princeton, which is ironically apropos, abit most seem to be cosmologists.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K