What evidence supports the possibility of nuclear fusion in palladium cathodes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of nuclear fusion occurring in palladium cathodes, particularly in the context of cold fusion experiments initiated by Pons and Fleischman in 1989. Participants explore various hypotheses, experimental evidence, and theoretical implications related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the original cold fusion experiment by Pons and Fleischman, suggesting that palladium's ability to absorb hydrogen may lead to energy release under certain conditions.
  • One participant argues that the absence of expected neutrons and energy from D-T fusion reactions indicates that fusion is not occurring, questioning the validity of cold fusion claims.
  • Another participant mentions ongoing cold fusion research in the UK, highlighting the challenges of distinguishing between fusion-generated neutrons and incident neutrons.
  • Some contributors propose that while there may be exothermic reactions occurring, they do not constitute nuclear fusion, citing alternative explanations such as those by Widom and Larsen regarding low momentum neutrons.
  • There are references to experimental results indicating neutron emissions in sonofusion experiments, but some participants assert that these do not confirm nuclear fusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the possibility of cold fusion and others firmly rejecting it based on the lack of observable evidence. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the nature of the reactions occurring in palladium cathodes.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific experimental conditions, the need for further corroboration of findings, and the unresolved nature of the reactions being discussed. Participants acknowledge the complexity of distinguishing between different types of reactions and the implications for the cold fusion hypothesis.

  • #31
Ben Powell said:
Abstract: Almost two decades ago, Fleischmann and Pons
reported excess enthalpy generation in the negatively
polarized Pd/D-D2O system, which they attributed to
nuclear reactions. In the months and years that followed,
other manifestations of nuclear activities in this system
were observed, viz. tritium and helium production and
transmutation of elements.
Their factually incorrect statements about the history of the subject raise a red flag re their credibility. As we don't have access to the actual papers you have cited here, there is little that we can say about them - which is why you have been met with so much silence. But be advised that due to the history of fraud surrounding this topic, we are highly skeptical of the subject matter and keep a very short leash on such discussions. This leash includes a constraint against speculation and posing of unverified, unpublished theories as stated in our TOS (as in your last post).
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K