I'm a visual thinker so I struggle a bit to get my head around calculus concepts. So as an example, heres a potential energy surface:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

lets say this represents the structure of a simple molecule like n-propane:

the molecule in the picture is the most stable conformation so the global minimum (the big pit) on the PES represents that conformation. Then the local minimum (the little bit) represents the staggered conformation. If I rotate or stretch the bonds in any other way, then it becomes less stable so the molecules energy will no longer be represented by a minimum on the PES.

I can see how the first derivative will help you locate the minima because the slope will be 0 there. The first derivative of this potential energy surface is called the "force" which makes sense to me because the y axis represents the potential energy so when the molecule is in a stable conformation, the force which would ordinarily push the molecule into a stable conformation (if it was in an unstable one) is 0. What I'm trying to get my head around now is what the 2nd derivative represents. They call it the "force constant" and I know that in computational chemistry, they'll calculate the "force constant matrix" for a molecule. I'm trying to figure out what that means.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What exactly does the second derivative represent

Loading...

Similar Threads - exactly does second | Date |
---|---|

B Derivation of exact differential | Jul 29, 2017 |

What is an integrating factor exactly? | Jun 6, 2015 |

What exactly is the relationship between calculus and differential equ | Mar 23, 2014 |

When exactly does the tabular method for integration by parts fail? | Feb 12, 2012 |

Does it exist and is it continuous? (exact) | Oct 6, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**