What Explains the Lack of Current in a PN Junction at Equilibrium?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the lack of current in a PN junction at equilibrium, exploring the mechanisms behind charge movement and the formation of a depletion region. Participants examine theoretical explanations and the roles of electric fields and thermal motion in semiconductor behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the formation of a depletion region due to the movement of electrons and holes, suggesting that this leads to an electric field that cancels current flow.
  • Another participant challenges the assertion that there is no current in equilibrium, arguing that holes and electrons are free to move and that the original explanation lacks clarity regarding which currents cancel.
  • A later reply proposes that a sketch would illustrate four currents: two driven by the electric field (electrons moving against the field and holes moving with the field) and two due to random thermal motions (electrons moving from P to N and holes moving from N to P), which cancel each other out in equilibrium.
  • Further clarification is provided that drift currents are driven by the electric field and obey Ohm's law, while diffusion currents arise from concentration gradients and follow Fick's law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the explanation of current flow in the depletion region at equilibrium. While some agree that the currents cancel, there is no consensus on the clarity or correctness of the initial claims made.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of drift and diffusion currents, as well as the specific conditions under which the currents are said to cancel. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of semiconductor behavior.

unified
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I am considering a PN junction at equilibrium, and have a couple of questions.
Consider a PN junction doped with say phosphorous on the N side, and Boron on the P side. Initially, there is an opportunity for the electrons just below the N conduction band to drop to the lower available energy states just above the P valence band. This leaves the N side positively charged and the P side negatively charged, forming a depletion region. This means that there will be an electric field pointing in the direction from N to P. Eventually, there will be an equilibrium that is reached, in which case there is no current in the depletion region.

I do not know which of the following explains why there is no current in the depletion region under equilibrium.
1. The electric field causes electrons from the negatively charged P side to flow back to the N type, and in equilibrium this cancels the flow of electrons from N to P. Also, the electric field causes holes to flow from N to P, and this cancels any holes flowing from P to N. The result of these processes is zero net current.
2. There is no current flowing either from N to P or P to N in equilibrium. In equilibrium, the depletion region is essentially an insulator, and while we have an electric field present in the region, the charge is not free to flow.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
(2) is clearly wrong. The holes and electrons are free to move. (1) is closer, but isn't very clearly stated. Exactly which currents cancel? Try drawing a sketch to show the various currents.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: unified
phyzguy,

A sketch would include four currents, two from the field (electrons move against the field, holes with the field) and two due to random thermal motions (electrons from P to N, holes from N to P). In equilibrium these effects cancel.
 
unified said:
phyzguy,

A sketch would include four currents, two from the field (electrons move against the field, holes with the field) and two due to random thermal motions (electrons from P to N, holes from N to P). In equilibrium these effects cancel.
Exactly. This is much more clearly stated than your original (1). In semiconductor nomenclature, the currents driven by the electric field are typically called "drift currents" and the currents due to random thermal motions are typically called "diffusion currents". The drift currents obey Ohm's law (J = σE), and the diffusion currents are driven by concentration gradients and obey Fick's law (J=-D∇n).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: unified, berkeman and Baluncore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K