What force is needed to overcome expansion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rede96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the gravitational forces required to counteract cosmic expansion, particularly in the context of Einstein's cosmological constant and the Hubble constant of 70 m/s per megaparsec. It is established that gravitationally bound objects do not move apart due to expansion, and that a constant gravitational force is sufficient to maintain their proximity. The conversation also touches on the concept of Jeans Instability, which provides a framework for understanding the conditions under which gravitational binding can be disrupted by cosmic expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's General Relativity and the cosmological constant
  • Familiarity with the Hubble constant and its implications for cosmic expansion
  • Knowledge of gravitational binding and its effects on celestial objects
  • Concept of Jeans Instability in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Hubble constant on cosmic expansion dynamics
  • Study Einstein's cosmological constant and its role in modern cosmology
  • Explore the concept of Jeans Instability and its mathematical framework
  • Investigate the conditions under which gravitationally bound systems can become detached due to cosmic expansion
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology who are interested in the interplay between gravitational forces and cosmic expansion, as well as those studying the stability of celestial systems.

rede96
Messages
663
Reaction score
16
As I understand it gravitationally bound objects don’t move apart with expansion. So I was wondering, assuming constant acceleration of expansion, what is the minimum gravitational force required to keep objects from moving apart?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Are you talking about static universe model.
 
RyanH42 said:
Are you talking about static universe model.

I'm not really well up on current models as I am just an interested layman. So was wondering if we assume the current Hubble constant of 70 m/s per mega parsec
 
Albert Einstein added a positive cosmological constant to his equations of general relativity to counteract the attractive effects of gravity on ordinary matter, which would otherwise cause a spatially finite universe to either collapse or expand forever.This is the property of static universe.If you need numbers I can't help you.
 
RyanH42 said:
Albert Einstein added a positive cosmological constant to his equations of general relativity to counteract the attractive effects of gravity on ordinary matter, which would otherwise cause a spatially finite universe to either collapse or expand forever.This is the property of static universe.If you need numbers I can't help you.

Ok, thanks for that. I was probably thinking more practically than that. I read that expansion does not apply any forces to objects. So if this was the case then it seemed that any force at all attracting / binding two objects would be enough for it to stop them receding with expansion. But that assumes a constant rate of acceleration.
 
In a system of objects which are gravitationally bound they will in general remain gravitationally bound and not significantly affected by cosmic scale expansion.
I can imagine however that there could be edge cases where a very loosely bound object can become detached.
After all, the extent of an objects gravitational field is infinite, (is it not?), - although it becomes insignificantly weak far from the object.
So there is no place in the universe where gravity is totally absent, just extremely weak, and weak enough so that expansion could dissociate for example a tiny outlying galaxy from a loosely bound cluster.
This is not a theory, it just seems to me as if it could be possible, but probably someone can present me with impenitrable math which refutes the possibility, and I will happily take their word for it.
 
There's a distinction between unaccelerated expansion, which as I understand it has no effect whatsoever, and a cosmological constant (leading to accelerated expansion) which is similar to a tiny repulsive force proportional to distance - the latter doesn't prevent the formation of gravitationally bound systems up to the scale of say galaxy superclusters, but it becomes significant at cosmological distances. I am not sure of this but if my recollection is correct, the distance at which this repulsion balances gravity is roughly of the same order as the Hubble radius.
 
rede96 said:
As I understand it gravitationally bound objects don’t move apart with expansion. So I was wondering, assuming constant acceleration of expansion, what is the minimum gravitational force required to keep objects from moving apart?
Depends upon how massive the objects are and how far apart they are.

Read up on Jeans Instability if you want an in-depth analysis on how this works:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeans_instability
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Receding movement of a stopped object in an accelerating universe?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Undergrad Is Expansion of Space Affecting Gravitational and Nuclear Forces?
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
High School Observers sending signals to measure expansion
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate Gravitational Instability and accelerated explanation of Universe?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Undergrad Age of the Universe and the Cosmological Constant
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Undergrad How do you get to the conclusion that there is accelerating expansion?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Undergrad More extended equilibrium configurations due to dark energy?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Undergrad Does dark-energy require a source of energy?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad The Evolution of Galactic Scale Cosmic Voids
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Can the force of gravity overcome the Planck force?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K