What Gives a Motionless Meteorite Shard Momentum in the Curvature of the Sun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
In General Relativity (GR), the curvature of spacetime dictates the movement of objects, including a stationary meteorite shard placed near the Sun. The shard, despite having zero initial velocity, begins to move towards the Sun due to the curvature created by the Sun's mass, which influences its trajectory through spacetime. This movement is not due to a force acting on the shard but rather a result of the geometry of spacetime itself, where even stationary particles have trajectories that curve. The discussion also highlights the distinction between kinematic and dynamic views of motion, emphasizing that in curved spacetime, distances can change without traditional movement or acceleration. Ultimately, the interaction between mass and spacetime curvature is crucial for understanding how objects move in the universe.
  • #31
tiny-tim said:
ah … but the ball doesn't feel the bumps, it looks at them …

so it's using eyesight to calculate gravity! :wink:

How long does the ball take to calculate gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
DaleSpam said:
Hi Chaste,

This is best understood in geometrical terms. Do you understand (in SR) how the worldline of an inertially moving object is a straight line? If two inertially moving objects are at rest wrt each other then their worldlines are two parallel lines. In a flat space the distance between two parallel lines is constant and they never intersect.

Now, consider geometry on a sphere. On a sphere a "straight" line is a great circle. Longitude lines are examples of great circles. If you consider two nearby longitude lines at the equator they are parallel, and yet at the poles they intersect and the distance between the two lines is not constant.

So, on a sphere two lines can be parallel at one point and intersect at another point despite the fact that both lines are straight at all points. Translating back to physics, in a curved spacetime two observers can be at rest wrt each other at one point and their paths can intersect despite the fact that neither accelerates at any point (they are each inertial at all points).

Isn't that called geodesic deviation and shows that the tidal forces of a gravitational field (which cause trajectories of neighboring particles to converge/diverge) can be represented by curvature of a spacetime in which particles follow geodesics
 
  • #33
Yes, but I would add the qualifier "inertial" so that it is "trajectories of neighboring inertial particles to converge/diverge" and "a spacetime in which inertial particles follow geodesics".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K