What happens before crossing the Event Horizon

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter antd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Event horizon Horizon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of objects as they approach the event horizon of a black hole, particularly focusing on the observational effects experienced by distant observers. It explores concepts such as redshift, signal timing, and the implications for causality in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that as objects approach the event horizon, they appear to freeze from the perspective of distant observers due to the extreme redshift and delay of light signals.
  • Others argue that this "freezing" is not instantaneous but rather a gradual process where the frequency and intensity of light diminish, making the object increasingly difficult to observe.
  • A participant suggests that signals emitted by an object falling into a black hole would reach distant observers at progressively increasing intervals, leading to the conclusion that the object would never be seen crossing the event horizon.
  • Another participant questions whether the increase in the black hole's gravity, as it consumes objects, violates causality since the object has not yet crossed the event horizon from the observer's perspective.
  • Some participants clarify that while light travels at a constant speed, the metric of spacetime near the event horizon affects the perceived timing of signals, leading to an infinite delay in signal reception as the object approaches the event horizon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the "freezing" effect and the implications for causality, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus on these complex topics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the understanding of spacetime metrics and the effects of gravitational fields on signal propagation, which remain unresolved among participants.

antd
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Suppose this happens:

10 billion people are taken to a large black hole.
The people are thrown into the black hole as we fly around it in the large spaceship.

I have read that when an object goes past the event horizon, we as observers away from the black hole will see the people freeze just before crossing it.

So does this mean that we would forever see 10 billion people frozen around this black hole?

If so, then why don't we see the tons of matter which the black hole has previously devoured (other planets and stars etc) in black holes today

I would like to be told what is happening here... I don't understand why they would 'freeze' and many sources tell me things would indeed freeze before crossing the event horizon, to an on-looker's point of view. I would assume it is some kind of optical illusion, since the light cannot be frozen there...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens is that as things approach the event horizon, then the light which is returned to an observer further away gets increasingly delayed. It would be infinitely delayed at the event horizon itself. This means that although the image appears to be slowing down to a halt as it approaches the event horizon, it also rapidly becomes extremely red-shifted, to the point where the frequency and intensity are so low that it is no longer observable.
 
As Jonathan Scott said, it is not an instant freezing, it is a gradual red-shifting which is analogous to the doppler effect. Alternately, you can picture that it takes energy to "climb out" of the gravity well caused by the black hole, thus reducing the energy of each photon, leaving it with a longer wavelength.

I suggest you read "The Black Hole Wars" by Leonard Susskind, as he goes into great detail about this very question.
 
Thank you. I'll try to find that book online.
 
Suppose a person sitting on the object falling into black hole were to emit signal at regular interval in his own reference frame.
These signals would reach us at infinity at progressively increasing interval of time..
As the object approaches event horizon , the timing between arrival of two signals would become infinite.
Hence we would never see an object crossing event horizon.

Now the object would fall into the black hole(and reach singularity) in finite proper time in it`s frame.
This would result into increase in the mass of the black hole. Which would change the gravity. So with respect to us although we would never see object crossing even horizon we would see an increase in the gravity.

Does it not in some sense violate causality.

We see object that has not yet fallen into black hole abut yet there is an increase in the gravity of the black hole ? :confused:
 
These signals would reach us at infinity at progressively increasing interval of time..
As the object approaches event horizon , the timing between arrival of two signals would become infinite.

Whyso? Light travels at c in all reference frames. All we would see is those signals changing in wavelength.
 
Whyso? Light travels at c in all reference frames. All we would see is those signals changing in wavelength.

Please read chapter on black holes from Sean Carroll`s book or free online notes on General relativity.
This is true that signals would be redshifted. But also they would reach us with interval between two signals increasing as object approaches event horizon.

You are right that light travels with speed c. But distance between two points with coordinate separation (dr) is not just (dr).

But rather it is determined by metric as well.
Scwarzschild metric has (1-2GM/r) factor in denominator accompanying (dr)**2 .
Hence distance between two points with same coordinate separation would increase if we are close to event horizon.

Hence separation between the signal sent by person sitting on object falling into black hole would increase as object approaches event horizon.

Because distance between two points is rendered infinite by the metric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K