What happens to physics majors who couldn't make it grad school?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the career paths of physics graduates who do not pursue graduate school, exploring the implications of academic performance and the assumptions surrounding the necessity of further education in physics. Participants examine various employment opportunities and societal perceptions of physics degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that many physics graduates find high-paying jobs in defense or finance, while others enter industry or become science communicators.
  • There is a contention that the assumption of graduate school as the "normal" path for physics graduates is unwarranted and potentially offensive to those who choose different career paths.
  • Participants argue that a physics degree is an academic discipline rather than a pre-professional degree, and that many graduates end up in business roles unrelated to their major.
  • Some participants note that those who perform poorly academically may have fewer career options compared to their peers who excelled.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of degrees, with some participants emphasizing that physics does not prepare students for a narrowly-defined career path like some other fields do.
  • One participant expresses a desire for clearer guidance on the implications of choosing a physics major, indicating that this information could have influenced their decision-making.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the career trajectories of physics graduates and the assumptions about the necessity of graduate school. The discussion remains unresolved with differing opinions on the implications of academic performance and the nature of physics degrees.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of assumptions regarding career paths and the diversity of outcomes for physics graduates, indicating that the discussion is influenced by personal experiences and perceptions of the job market.

-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7
Either because they had a bad GPA, little research experience, bad GRE, or a combination of the three? I imagine only a fraction of physics grads end up making it to graduate school, and aside from those who were planning to be high school physics teachers, where do the rest end up? Do most of them end up switching fields due to having no luck in finding employment, which may be due to their low GPA or little to no research experience?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I've seen? High paying jobs in defense or finance. Some end up in industry. A small fraction end up as science communicators of some description.
 
e.bar.goum said:
From what I've seen? High paying jobs in defense or finance. Some end up in industry. A small fraction end up as science communicators of some description.

Those tend to be the types that probably did have good enough credentials (high GPA) to get into graduate school, anyways. I'm asking about those that weren't good enough to make it into graduate school.
 
There seem to be all sorts of unwarranted assumptions in this. One is that the "normal" path for a physics grad is to go to grad school, and those that don't have somehow done something wrong. (And frankly, that's a little offensive - that someone who made a different choice in life couldn't hack it) Another is that a degree in physics is somehow a pre-professional degree like engineering or nursing. It's not - it's an academic discipline. Most people graduating from college end up going into business, and usually not doing exactly what they majored in. Businesses do not hire many historians or poets.

If you stick "jobs with a physics degree" in Google, you get 15 million hits. In my graduating class we had teachers, scientists, a lawyer, a doctor, a technical writer, salespeople, military officers, a politician, several programmers, a banker, and several others.

Oh, and like in any other course of study, people who do poorly discover they have fewer options at the end of it than people who do well.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There seem to be all sorts of unwarranted assumptions in this. One is that the "normal" path for a physics grad is to go to grad school, and those that don't have somehow done something wrong. (And frankly, that's a little offensive - that someone who made a different choice in life couldn't hack it) Another is that a degree in physics is somehow a pre-professional degree like engineering or nursing. It's not - it's an academic discipline. Most people graduating from college end up going into business, and usually not doing exactly what they majored in. Businesses do not hire many historians or poets.

If you stick "jobs with a physics degree" in Google, you get 15 million hits. In my graduating class we had teachers, scientists, a lawyer, a doctor, a technical writer, salespeople, military officers, a politician, several programmers, a banker, and several others.

Oh, and like in any other course of study, people who do poorly discover they have fewer options at the end of it than people who do well.

Very true. When you consider that a PhD is like an apprenticeship for academia, it makes very little sense that going to grad school is a "default" option, like it appears to be on these boards (perhaps a selection effect?). Indeed, most of the people in my degree aren't planning on becoming academics.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There seem to be all sorts of unwarranted assumptions in this. One is that the "normal" path for a physics grad is to go to grad school, and those that don't have somehow done something wrong. (And frankly, that's a little offensive - that someone who made a different choice in life couldn't hack it) Another is that a degree in physics is somehow a pre-professional degree like engineering or nursing. It's not - it's an academic discipline. Most people graduating from college end up going into business, and usually not doing exactly what they majored in. Businesses do not hire many historians or poets.

If you stick "jobs with a physics degree" in Google, you get 15 million hits. In my graduating class we had teachers, scientists, a lawyer, a doctor, a technical writer, salespeople, military officers, a politician, several programmers, a banker, and several others.

Oh, and like in any other course of study, people who do poorly discover they have fewer options at the end of it than people who do well.


Engineering is also an academic discipline. A pre-professional degree would be something like pre-med.
 
If you prefer "professional" for engineers (and nurses) because the bachelors is the common terminal degree I am fine with that, but it doesn't change the point.
 
CaptainHowdy1 said:
Engineering is also an academic discipline. A pre-professional degree would be something like pre-med.

There are degrees that prepare students for a very narrowly-defined career path. These degrees include things like Forestry, Accounting, Nursing, Library Science, or Engineering.

I interpreted what Vanadium said as meaning, a BS in physics is not that kind of degree. Btw, I wish someone has explained that to me when I was deciding what to major in -- it's very, very wise advice.
 
All I just wanted to know is what kind of options do physics grads who do not end up going to graduate school have and what kind of industries they usually work in (I've heard engineering does not take well to physics grads).
 
  • #10
Like I said, if you stick "jobs with a physics degree" in Google, you get 15 million hits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K