What Happens to Potential Energy When Height Approaches Infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamataat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of potential energy as the height of an object approaches infinity, particularly in the context of gravitational potential energy. Participants explore the implications of using the equation E_p = mgh and the assumptions surrounding gravitational acceleration (g) at varying heights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the validity of the potential energy equation E_p = mgh at large heights and question the implications of treating g as non-constant. Some suggest integrating the work done against gravity for a more accurate representation. Others discuss the concept of escape velocity and its relation to potential energy at infinity.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding potential energy and escape velocity. Some participants offer clarifications on the conditions necessary for escape from Earth's gravitational field, while others express confusion about the relationship between kinetic and potential energy at infinity.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the assumptions made regarding gravitational force and potential energy definitions, particularly at large distances from Earth. Participants are also navigating the implications of conservation of energy in the context of escape velocity.

Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
If h, the height of a body from the ground, approaches infinity, then the body's potential energy approaches 0? I'm assuming a non-constant value for g.

E_p = mgh. In this equation I get 0 times infinity, which is mathematically indeterminate, but I'm guessing that the physical interpretation takes it to equal 0?

- Kamataat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation--E_p = mgh--is only good for measuring gravitational PE near the surface of the earth. (As you note, g is not constant as the height of a body increases, but that equation ignores that fact.) Also, the implied reference point in that equation takes the surface of the Earth as the point where PE = 0.

If you want to go to infinity, you'll have to integrate the work done against gravity which varies with distance. Also, it's more convenient to take infinity as the PE = 0 point, which makes the potential energy negative for sub-infinite distances. Just for the record, the gravitational PE for an object of mass m at a distance of r from center of the Earth (where r > radius of the earth) is given by:
-\frac{G M_{(earth)} m}{r}
 
Kamataat said:
If h, the height of a body from the ground, approaches infinity, then the body's potential energy approaches 0? I'm assuming a non-constant value for g.
E_p = mgh. In this equation I get 0 times infinity, which is mathematically indeterminate, but I'm guessing that the physical interpretation takes it to equal 0?
- Kamataat
mgh is only valid near the surface of the Earth, that is when
h<<R(earth). The formula for larger h is E_p=(mgR^2)/(R+h), which-->0 as h-->infty.
 
So if a question asks to find the speed which a body must achieve at ground level to escape the Earth's grav. field, then I can take E_p@infinty = 0? From that |E_k|=|E_p| to find the speed?

- Kamataat
 
Sounds good. (Mechanical energy is conserved. The total energy at r = infinity that an object must have to just barely escape is zero.)
 
Thank you!

- Kamataat
 
I don't think what you told is correct. This only means that the Kinetic energy of a body that jumps out of Earth's gravitational field increases suddenly. This doesn't mean that 0 kinetic energy is enough for a body to be propelled outside the Earth's gravitational field.
 
vaishakh said:
I don't think what you told is correct. This only means that the Kinetic energy of a body that jumps out of Earth's gravitational field increases suddenly.
I don't understand what you're saying. What do you mean by an object "jumping" out of the Earth's field?

This doesn't mean that 0 kinetic energy is enough for a body to be propelled outside the Earth's gravitational field.
If you just make it to r = infinity with zero KE you have effectively escaped the Earth's gravity. That condition will give you the minimum speed at the Earth's surface that will get you to infinity. (This is called the escape velocity.) If you want to end up with some non-zero speed at infinity, you'll need a greater initial speed. The basic idea of energy conservation still applies.
 
sorry-Doc Al
yes, much better interpretation is that escape velocity depends on gravitational force. as r tends to infinity gravitational force tends to zero. thus that's true.
we were confused since we were comparing it with the potential energy.
 
  • #10
ya i must ask what r going to infinity has to do with escape velocity, when one can simply assume its when KE=PE
 
  • #11
"Going to infinity" is what escaping the Earth means. To just barely make it, you'd need zero speed at r = infinity. Since PE = 0 (by definition) at r = infinity, the total energy needed is zero. At the Earth's surface, that translates into: KE + PE = 0. Thus KE = - PE. (PE is negative at the Earth's surface.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K