What happens to the intersection of subsets when the class is empty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samkolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
AI Thread Summary
When the class of subsets {A1, A2, ...} is empty, the intersection of all Ai is defined as the universal set U. This concept arises from the principle that the intersection of an empty collection of sets includes all elements of the universal set. The confusion often stems from understanding how to conceptualize intersections when no sets are present. If a point P is not in any subset Ai, it implies that Ai does not exist within the empty class. This clarification helps in grasping the implications of intersections in topology.
samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm starting a book on topology and I've come to this come to this confusing statement:

Let A1, A2, ... be subsets of some universal set U.

If the class {A1, A2, ...} is empty, then the intersection of all the Ai is U.


I know that the intersection of empty sets is empty, but I don't quite see how to even think of the intersection of the Ai when {A1, A2, ...} is empty.

Can anyone explain this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does it mean for a point not to be in the intersection of a class?

Let P be a point. Can you find a set in your class that doesn't contain P?
 
I think I get it now. If P is not in some Ai, then Ai must exist in {A1, A2, ...}, which is empty.

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top