MHB What happens to the phase of a wave during scattering?

Nono713
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
615
Reaction score
4
Hi,
I can't seem to find any straightforward information on this. I know wave transmission does not change the incident wave's phase, and wave reflection shifts it by $\pi$ if the wave is reflected by a denser medium than the one it is in...

But what happens to the phase when the wave undergoes scattering? Is the phase unchanged, shifted by some constant, by some complex expression depending on the type of scattering involved and the direction of the scattered wave relative to the incident wave, or just changed randomly?

Approximations are fine, I don't need an exact solution but something tractable. This isn't for a physics class or paper but for a computer science project involving interference simulation.

Thanks!

EDIT: never mind, I've decided to ignore phase effects beyond thin-film interference and use the analytical formula for thin-film interference instead. Seems simpler this way.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the record, there are types of waves, such as solitons (that is the correct spelling) propagating down a fiber optic cable, that can "bump into each other", affecting each other's phase. Solitons are an interesting quantum mechanical phenomenon, with wave-like and particle-like characteristics. However, I think it is also true that some scattering situations, perhaps even most scattering situations, do not involve a phase change.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top