What Happens When Atoms Age and Decay: Fundamental Forces at Play?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of atoms in relation to fundamental forces, particularly focusing on attraction and repulsion, and how these forces influence atomic interactions. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving uncharged and charged atoms, as well as implications of atomic aging and nuclear decay.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that two uncharged atoms would remain stationary, while others suggest they would come together due to gravitational attraction, depending on their proximity and the influence of electron repulsion.
  • There is a contention regarding the behavior of like-charged atoms, with some arguing they would repel each other and travel apart asymptotically, while others suggest they might reach a stationary state due to a balance of forces.
  • Participants discuss the conditions under which atoms might combine or remain separate, with some asserting that electron repulsion prevents them from merging, while others suggest they could form molecules under certain conditions.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of atomic aging and nuclear decay, prompting questions about how these processes might alter the interactions between atoms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of atoms under various conditions, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist without a clear consensus on the outcomes of the scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about initial conditions, such as the initial velocity of atoms and the reference frame used for analysis, which remain unresolved. The implications of quantum uncertainty and the effects of nuclear decay are also noted but not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying atomic physics, fundamental forces, and the implications of atomic interactions in theoretical contexts.

Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
IDK if my understanding is right...but as far as I understand physics...all the fundament forces shares 2 characteristics - attraction and repulsion...now, here are my questions..

1. Assume there are only 2 uncharged atoms in the universe...would they come together or go apart or stay where they are?

2. If there were two atoms w/ such charges that they repelled, would they travel apart forever or would they slow down at such a rate that there would be an asymptote?

3. If they were attracted to each other, would they only stick together or would they become one?(what is the force that is keeping them apart?) Since everything in the universe tries to establish equalibrium...should those 2 atoms be equally distributed by first unifying then distributing?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the above questions are fundamental in nature and requires nothing more than the knowledge of fundamental physics.

1. The law of gravitation is by far attractive in nature (though I have read some articles that describe its repulsive nature but that is our cup of tea right now). Therefore I can confidently say that the two masses would eventually come together(given the above conditions).

2. Charges of same nature always repell each other. Therefore the two particles would travell away from each other at a rate that would slow down asymptotically.

3. The outer portion of atoms contains negatively charged electrons. Therefore they would not become one due to the electron repulsion.
 
Last edited:
For 2.) I would think that they would repel and eventually stay stationary relative to each other due to the balance of gravity and EM. But on an atomic scale it's a different question, surely uncertainty would make a dog's breakfast out of that? You would know their exact positions at a certain time.
 
You raise an interesting question. I'm not sure there's a clean answer. The origin of the difficulty lies in the fact that you removed a clear reference frame- the fixed stars, for example. On the other hand, you do have a reference plane- that plane containing the two particles.

Mach's principle would seem to imply that what happens is indeterminate. You cannot unequivocably measure the rotational inertia within the plane. There is an effect called the "Lense-Thirring effect", or "frame dragging" which was verified recently by Gravity Probe B, but that holds for single rotating particles...

I'd be interested to read other responses...
 
1. Atoms would be attracted (gravitation), unless they were already so close (about the diameter of atom) that the repulsion of electrons is stronger.

2. The atoms would fly away from each other. the speed would not approach to zero, but to a constant determined by initial electrostatic energy and mass of atoms.

3. Because of electron-electron forces they would either bounce away or form a molecule
(if something forced them together in the beginning).

I assumed the initial velocity dr/dt(0) was 0 and that the line formed by the atoms was not rotating. Since we only have 2 points, we don't immediately see the perpendicular component of speed, so we can't really check for rotation of our coordinate system unless we wait some time to see if the Newton's law can explain the movement without introducing system forces (caused by acceleration of coordinate system).
 
Last edited:
Nice...but what would happen when the atom starts aging and nuclear decay comes into affect?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K