What happens when light is brought to an absolute stop?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter polaris12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of light being brought to a complete stop in an experimental setting, exploring the implications of this event on the nature of light, its energy, and the mechanisms involved in the process. Participants delve into theoretical and conceptual aspects, as well as the experimental conditions under which this occurs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of light being stopped, questioning what it means for light to have no velocity, frequency, or energy.
  • Others propose that the concept of light slowing down is an abstraction, suggesting that the information in light is stored in a medium rather than the light itself being stopped.
  • One participant clarifies that the light is not stopped in a vacuum but rather its state is transferred to atoms in a specially prepared material, such as a rare-earth-ion-doped crystal.
  • There is a discussion about the energy of light being partially stored in the medium during its travel and how this relates to the phenomenon of stopped light.
  • Some participants argue that the notion of light slowing down is misleading, emphasizing that photons always move at the speed of light and that delays are due to absorption and re-emission processes.
  • One participant challenges the idea that photons are constantly absorbed and emitted, suggesting that under certain conditions, light can pass through materials without loss, and the group velocity can vary based on the material's dispersion profile.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of light slowing down and the mechanisms involved. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the experimental results or the implications for the understanding of light.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of terms like "stopped light" and "absorption," as well as unresolved questions about the mechanisms of light interaction with materials.

polaris12
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100627072458.htm

According to the above article, light was brought to a complete stop during an experiment. What confuses me is that, if light has no mass, and is then manipulated to have no velocity either (which means there is no frequency and hence no energy) then what DOES it have? Does it even exist anymore? I did not understand this part of the article, and I would appreciate it if somebody could explain it to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fiction of light slowing down is probably not an intuitively useful abstraction at this point. Really, they just found way (an apparently very good way) to store the information in the light so that they can recreate it later.
 
Remeber, the light is not stopped in vacuum. What happens is actually that the state of the light is transferred to the atoms in a suitable prepared matter, which in this case is a rare-earth-ion-doped crystal.

One can also easily do slow light in these types of materials, where the light pulse is seen to be traveling slowly through the medium. One can show however, that in this case the energy of the light is only partially stored in the medium during the travel, and returned to the light as it exits. The slower you can get it to travel the more of the energy is transferred to the material, and in the special case of stopped light, everything is in the medium. The reason it's called stopped light is probably more historical (and because it sounds cool :biggrin: ).
 
Zarqon said:
(and because it sounds cool :biggrin: ).
:rolleyes: This is the source of a lot of confusion, sometimes even propagating among people who should know better. Sometimes such news articles even go so far I scratch my head and go: what the hell were they trying to claim? I tend to find the actual facts far more interesting, and intriguing when certain glossed over questions remain unanswered.
 
Oh, so its just a not-completely-true simplification of what's actually going on, which is that energy/information is being transferred into the material?
 
As light enters a transparent solid, it slows down and increases in frequency (in other words, its wavelength gets shorter).
If light slows down to a near-standstill, therefore, it would become extremely energetic.
 
Glen Bartusch said:
As light enters a transparent solid, it slows down and increases in frequency (in other words, its wavelength gets shorter).
It would take a strange material to change the frequency; normally it's held constant, while velocity and wavelength vary proportionally.

It's relevant to the topic to recognize that light slowing down is a fiction. Photons always move at the speed of light; but because they are constantly being absorbed and emitted, the progress of the (bulk of the) wavefront is delayed, and that's what is really meant by "light slows down".
 
Hurkyl said:
It Photons always move at the speed of light; but because they are constantly being absorbed and emitted, the progress of the (bulk of the) wavefront is delayed, and that's what is really meant by "light slows down".
Is there any real evidence for this? I heard that how the photon slows down is actually not known.
 
Hurkyl said:
It's relevant to the topic to recognize that light slowing down is a fiction. Photons always move at the speed of light; but because they are constantly being absorbed and emitted, the progress of the (bulk of the) wavefront is delayed, and that's what is really meant by "light slows down".

This is not entirely true.

Saying photons are constantly being absorbed and reemitted suggests a resonant phenomena, which is usually not the case. By tailoring the inhomogeneous profile for a material such as the one mentioned in the OP, one can create a situation where you have a strong dispersion profile (refractive index varies greatly with frequency), but zero absorption.

In this case the spectral components of a pulse going through the material sees different refractive indicies and when you sum up the movement of all spectral components, it is seen that the group velocity of the pulse is either slower of faster than c depending on the actualy shape of the dispersion curve.

The refractive index itself is of course due to light interacting with the atoms in the material, but it's very offresonant interaction so one should probably not call it absorption and emission, and in addition, no light is lost in the crystal, one can make 100% go through.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K