What Height Should a Lamp Be Above a Round Table for Maximum Edge Lighting?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The optimal height for an electric lamp above the center of a round table with radius r for maximum edge lighting is calculated to be r/(sqrt 2). The illumination formula used is I = k sin f / d², where f is the angle of inclination of the light rays, d is the distance from the light source to the illuminated surface, and k represents the intensity of the light source. By applying trigonometric relationships and Pythagorean theorem, the relationship between height (h) and distance (d) is established, leading to the differentiation of I with respect to h to find the maximum illumination point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometry and angles
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Knowledge of illumination formulas and light intensity concepts
  • Basic calculus for differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the illumination formula I = k sin f / d²
  • Learn about the application of the Pythagorean theorem in lighting design
  • Research the principles of light intensity and its measurement
  • Explore advanced calculus techniques for optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Interior designers, lighting engineers, and anyone involved in optimizing lighting solutions for round tables or similar settings.

leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
At what height above the center of a round table of RADIUS r should be an electric lamp to make the edge lighting Maximun?. (Note: llumlnation is expressed for the forrmula I = k sen f/ d 2 where f is the angle of inclination of rays, d is the distance from the light source to the illuminated surface and K as the intensity of the light source

Answer r/(sqrt 2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really should be able to at least show an attempt. I would begin by observing:

$$\sin(f)=\frac{h}{d}$$

Hence:

$$I=k\frac{h}{d^3}$$

Now, by Pythagoras, we know:

$$r^2+h^2=d^2$$

So, can you now state $I$ as a function of the variable $h$ and the constant $r$? Then, differentiate with respect to $h$ and equate the result to zero, then solve for $h$, and the result you cite will follow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K