What i call the second Euler's Number

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter x2thay
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and definitions of Euler's number (e) and explores a related function, f(x)=(1-1/x)^x, to investigate whether it yields a meaningful constant. Participants examine the limits of these functions and question the implications of their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Euler's number, e, is approximately 2.7182818 and is defined as the limit of f(x)=(1+1/x)^x as x approaches infinity.
  • Another participant states that the limit of f(x)=(1-1/x)^x as x approaches infinity equals e^{-1}, suggesting that this limit has significance.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the evaluation of limits using substitution methods, questioning why certain limits yield 1 instead of e.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of e in terms of its power series expansion and its relationship to differential equations.
  • One participant challenges the idea that the limit of (1+n)^(1/n) as n approaches 0 is also 1, seeking clarification on this point.
  • Another participant corrects a claim about limits, stating that 1^{+\infty} is an indeterminate form, indicating a misunderstanding in limit evaluation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the definitions and properties of e, with some agreeing on its limit definitions while others question the evaluation methods and implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the significance of the limit of f(x)=(1-1/x)^x.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the participants' understanding of substitution methods and indeterminate forms, which may affect their conclusions about the limits discussed.

x2thay
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Everyone of us know about the famous euler's number, which is e, which is aproximately 2.7182818...(as far as i cam remember)...which is used for many things in calculus...

Well, i was wondering where the heck does e come from and i realize after searching in the web, that e is the limit as x aproaches to the infinite, of the function f(x)=(1+1/x)^x or f(x)=(1+x)^(1/x). And this is awesome! Because i had no idea e was a limit! lol

Anyway, next thing i was wondering about was: what if the '+' sinal in the function f(x)=(1+1/x)^x gets switched to an '-'? The function would become: f(x)=(1-1/x)^x.

Here are the functions: http://www.geocities.com/just_dre/e3e.GIF

Well, i graphed both functions and as expected, f(x)=(1+1/x)^x aproachs to e. But the other function (the grey one) has a different limit which is aproximately 0,3678794409875026009331610590813...

My question is: does this new irrational constant have any meaning? If f(x)=(1+1/x)^x has, why can't f(x)=(1-1/x)^x?

Hope you can help me...^^

iMiguel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's fairly easy to see that for any real number y,

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\left(1+\frac{y}{x}\right)^x = e^y[/tex]

In particular,

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^x = e^{-1}[/tex]

Note also that e^y can equivalently be defined in terms of its power series expansion as the solution to the differential equation f '(y)=f(y).
 
Last edited:
The number is defined as the limit of (1+1/n)^n as n approched infinity.
My question is why is that limit the number e. If you evaluate it useing the subsistutaion method, you get the limit is 1.

E is also defined as the limit of (1+n)^(1/n) as n approaches 0. Using the substitution method isn't this limit also 1?
 
a.a said:
The number is defined as the limit of (1+1/n)^n as n approched infinity.
My question is why is that limit the number e.
One could take that as a definition. Or one could prove that it satisfies the definition you take for e, for example, if you define e to be the number such that [itex]de^y/dy = e^y[/itex] you can differentiate the expression in quasars post and show that it equals its own derivative in the limit [itex]x \to \infty[/itex], or you can plug in the power expansion and show that it is the same number.

If you evaluate it useing the subsistutaion method, you get the limit is 1. E is also defined as the limit of (1+n)^(1/n) as n approaches 0. Using the substitution method isn't this limit also 1?
You made me curious, can you show us how you do that?
 
a.a said:
If you evaluate it useing the subsistutaion method, you get the limit is 1.
No you don't; [itex]1^{+\infty}[/itex] is an indeterminate form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K