What if expansion rate of a universe is the speed of light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the implications of considering the expansion rate of the universe as the speed of light, particularly in relation to the Big Bang and the nature of the universe's expansion. Participants engage with concepts of cosmology, the nature of the Big Bang, and the idea of a multiverse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if the Big Bang is viewed as a central point with an equatorial expansion rate equal to the speed of light, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe.
  • Another participant counters that the Big Bang did not originate from a single point in pre-existing space, asserting that it occurred everywhere simultaneously.
  • A participant questions whether the universe is the only one, linking this to the previous discussion about the Big Bang and multiverse theories, which they describe as speculative.
  • One participant expresses interest in the expansion rate of the universe, suggesting that it might be compared to the speed of light through some derived parameter from early cosmological conditions.
  • Another participant clarifies that the expansion rate cannot be described as a speed, but rather as a ratio of speed to distance, emphasizing that this applies throughout the universe's history.
  • A participant raises a concern about the phrasing that implies the universe existed prior to the Big Bang, prompting further clarification on the nature of the Big Bang event.
  • One participant agrees with the clarification regarding the Big Bang, indicating acceptance of the explanation provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the Big Bang and its implications for the universe's expansion. There is no consensus on whether the universe is the only one or on the interpretation of the Big Bang event itself.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific interpretations of cosmological models and definitions, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the relationship between expansion rates and the speed of light.

Burtay Mutlu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What If we accept starting point of the big bang as the central point and what If the equatorial expansion rate of a spinning universe was the speed of light, how would it impact universe?
( In this question, you may think yourself as an observer from out of universe. I try to mean with "the central point", the coordinates. Starting point coordinates are according to an outer observer.)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Burtay Mutlu said:
What If we accept starting point of the big bang as the central point

There is no such point. The big bang did not start from one point in a pre-existing space and spread out from there. It happened everywhere in the universe at the same time.
 
PeterDonis said:
There is no such point. The big bang did not start from one point in a pre-existing space and spread out from there. It happened everywhere in the universe at the same time.

Thank you. :-) Then, You think,our universe is absolutely "the only one" ? There is no multiverses... At first, I thought like that. But a friend confused me...
 
Burtay Mutlu said:
You think,our universe is absolutely "the only one" ?

What I said has nothing to do with whether or not a "multiverse" theory is true. Multiverse theories are highly speculative, but regardless of whether they're true or not, what I said still applies to the Big Bang that happened in the universe we can see.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burtay Mutlu
I like this question, but maybe in a different form...

I think the present expansion is described as an increase in velocity per some distance of observed object, like 73.8km/s per Mpc (megaparsec or 3.26 million ly).

This makes comparing the expansion to c kind of apples and oranges... but I'm wondering if cosmologists have come up with some kind of derived attribute of expansion, back near the beginning, that does have some relationship to c... some aspect of the expansion or maybe inflation that had some perameter that might be correctly comparable to c. I wonder what that might be and what physical significance it might have for the point in time when the magnitudes (of whatever they are?) were precisely equal, and when that was.

Anyone know of such a parameter as this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burtay Mutlu
bahamagreen said:
Anyone know of such a parameter as this?

No. As you note, the expansion rate of the universe can't be described as a speed; the closest you can get is a ratio of speed to distance. (This is often better thought of as a fractional rate of expansion, i.e., the universe expands by some percentage per unit time.) This is true at any point in the universe's history, early as well as late.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burtay Mutlu
PeterDonis said:
It happened everywhere in the universe at the same time.
PeterDonis said:
... to the Big Bang that happened in the universe...
(...My bolding...)

The words, "happened in the universe" ... seems to imply that the universe already existed...?
 
OCR said:
The words, "happened in the universe" ... seems to imply the universe is already present...?

No, it just means that the event we refer to as the "Big Bang" (which, strictly speaking, is not the "initial singularity" that appears in idealized FRW models, but the initial hot, dense, rapidly expanding state of the universe which we know existed, even if we don't yet know what came before it) is part of the spacetime that we call the "universe".
 
PeterDonis said:
No, it just means that the event we refer to as the "Big Bang"...
That sounds fine by me... :oldcool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Burtay Mutlu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
256
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K