Undergrad What if there were no observers?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the implications of a universe without observers in the context of quantum mechanics (QM). It highlights that while QM often involves the concept of an observer, the universe can exist and evolve independently of conscious observers, as evidenced by events like the Big Bang and star formation. The wave function collapse, a key aspect of QM, is debated as being merely an interpretation rather than a physical process. Participants emphasize that the notion of "observer" can extend beyond conscious beings to any system capable of interaction, but QM's definitions rely on the presence of a macroscopic context. Overall, the conversation suggests that without observers, the framework of QM becomes challenging to define operationally.
  • #31
I see… I think I’m gonna lock the thread here since that’s probably the case. An “observer” is kind of an undefined thing where it can vary from person to person, so I suppose I had a wrong understanding on what it is. Still, thanks a lot for explaining all of this to me!

Best regards,
Seph

(oh right how do i lock it i actually don’t know)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
SephQ said:
how do i lock it i actually don’t know
You don't. You ask a moderator, like me, to lock it. :wink:

I have now done so. Thanks to all who participated in the thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K