What Inclination Angle Causes a Car to Slide Downhill at Constant Velocity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a car sliding down a hill and seeks to determine the inclination angle at which the car maintains a constant velocity. The context includes the mass of the car and the coefficients of friction between the tires and the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the car, including weight, normal force, and friction. There is an exploration of how to set up the force balance for constant velocity, with some confusion regarding the use of static versus kinetic friction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the correct application of friction coefficients and the components of weight. Some guidance has been offered regarding the forces involved, but there is still uncertainty about the setup of the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted distinction between static and kinetic friction, with participants clarifying the conditions under which each applies. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering the gravitational force's direction in relation to the slope.

CaptainSFS
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car of mas m = 1000kg is sliding down a hill. The coefficients of friction between the car's tires and the ground are us=0.89 and uk=0.61. For what inclination angle will the car slide down the hill with a constant velocity?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Now I realize that because it is constant velocity, the acceleration is 0, so the summation of the forces needs to be 0, but i don't know how to set this up. Any help?

Thanks. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CaptainSFS said:
Now I realize that because it is constant velocity, the acceleration is 0, so the summation of the forces needs to be 0, but i don't know how to set this up.

Hi CaptainSFS! :smile:

Hint: there are only three forces … the weight, the normal force, and the friction force … so set up a force triangle :smile:
 
hello, yes, so i have my two frictional forces pointing upwards on the slope. I set it up like this... (1000)(9.81cos(theta))(.89)+(1000)(9.81cos(theta))(.61)-?=0 ...If this is correct, which I am not so sure b/c it just seems like I wouldn't be able to create an opposite force to equal it, so that the acceleration is 0. These frictional forces really confuse me, and I feel like I keep setting it up wrong.
 
CaptainSFS said:
hello, yes, so i have my two frictional forces pointing upwards on the slope. I set it up like this... (1000)(9.81cos(theta))(.89)+(1000)(9.81cos(theta))(.61)-?=0 ...If this is correct, which I am not so sure b/c it just seems like I wouldn't be able to create an opposite force to equal it, so that the acceleration is 0. These frictional forces really confuse me, and I feel like I keep setting it up wrong.

Nooo …

i] you can't have both kinetic friction and static friction … it's one or the other

ii] what about the weight force?
 
okay, so I'm assuming them I will be using the static coefficient because that's the kind tires use on pavement and whatnot. For the weight force... would that be the force pulling the car down the slope? m*g*sin(theta)?

or do u mean the weight force as 1000*9.81?
 
CaptainSFS said:
okay, so I'm assuming them I will be using the static coefficient because that's the kind tires use on pavement and whatnot.

Whoa!

that would be for wheels that are rolling

the car is sliding (in other words, the wheels are locked)
For the weight force... would that be the force pulling the car down the slope? m*g*sin(theta)?

or do u mean the weight force as 1000*9.81?

the weight force is mg, and you use its component in the required direction.
 
okay, so if I'm using it in the required direction, don't I have to use m*g*sin(theta) because gravity isn't pulling it from the side, it's pulling straight down on it?
 
CaptainSFS said:
okay, so if I'm using it in the required direction, don't I have to use m*g*sin(theta) because gravity isn't pulling it from the side, it's pulling straight down on it?

Yes! Get on with it! :rolleyes:
 
thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K