What is a Borel Set? Explained with Examples

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hassman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A Borel set is defined as the smallest σ-algebra on a set X that contains all open subsets of X. In the context of a finite or countable metric space, all subsets can be considered Borel sets under the trivial topology. However, in more complex metric spaces, not every set qualifies as a Borel set. Key operations that generate Borel sets include unions, intersections, and complements of existing Borel sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of σ-algebras
  • Familiarity with topological spaces
  • Knowledge of metric spaces
  • Basic concepts of set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of σ-algebras in detail
  • Explore the concept of topologies in metric spaces
  • Investigate examples of Borel sets in the real line
  • Learn about operations on sets, including unions and intersections
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in advanced set theory and its applications in real analysis.

hassman
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have searched but the explanations that are given are too abstract. Why is it so difficult to use an example to show what a Borel set is?

Assume X = {1, 2, 3}. Then the power set of X is a topology. Borel set is defined on topologies right?

So what would be then a Borel set?

Or perhaps someone could explain to me without the above example, but in clearer terms what a Borel set is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The abstract definition is "the smallest σ-algebra on X that contains all the open subsets of X". So in this case, since a σ-algebra on X is a subset of the power set of X, and since the set of all open subsets of X is the power set (by your choice), the set of Borel sets is the power set. With this topology, a set is Borel if and only if it's open.

I suggest you look at exercises 1.9.3 and 1.9.8 in this book, and that you also read the comments after the exercises.
 
So, as noted, the Borel sets for a finite (or even countable) metric space turn out to be *all* subsets, so there is no need for a separate study of them. The best place to investigate Borel sets is the metric space of the real line. In that case, NOT every set is a Borel set.
 
thank you. i will buy that book probably. looks pretty good. i cannot make the exercises though as i lack the fundamentals.
 
So, as noted, the Borel sets for a finite (or even countable) metric space turn out to be *all* subsets

No, this is true only for the trivial (full) topology. For an extreme couterexample, consider the other trivial topology \left\{\emptyset,X\right\}.
 
JSuarez said:
No, this is true only for the trivial (full) topology. For an extreme couterexample, consider the other trivial topology \left\{\emptyset,X\right\}.
That cannot be the topology of a metric space, though, unless X is empty or a single point.
 
It's been some time since I last saw them, so someone correct me if I am wrong in thinking that these are precisely the Borel sets:
- open sets are Borel
- any set obtained from other Borel sets via unions and intersections is Borel
 
RoNN|3 said:
It's been some time since I last saw them, so someone correct me if I am wrong in thinking that these are precisely the Borel sets:
- open sets are Borel
- any set obtained from other Borel sets via unions and intersections is Borel

complements, too

countable intersections

countable unions

but keep repeating these operations (finitely many repetitions may not be enough...)
 
Indeed, I forgot the complements.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K