MHB What Is a Common Denominator for These Fractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khadeeja
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
Khadeeja
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please help me solve this calculation
 

Attachments

  • 15955727542859222108631462014354.jpg
    15955727542859222108631462014354.jpg
    741.8 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Khadeeja. Welcome to MHB. (Wave)

I can see

$\displaystyle \frac{r-1}{r^2-2r}-\frac{r-2}{r^2-4}+\frac{-2r}{r^2-2r} $

But then also there's $-1$ underneath that I'm not certain how it's connected to this expression.

It's not clear what you're asking as it stands. Could you post the full question/explain what you want to do?
 
I will assume that the "-1" MountEvariste is concerned about is from another problem.
(That's one of the many reasons why it is much better to type a problem in rather than post a picture.)

Do you know about "getting a common denominator" in order to add fractions?

Do you know that $r^2- 2r= r(r- 2)$ and that $r^2- 4= (r- 2)(r+ 2)$?

So what is a common denominator for these fractions?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top