What IS a field e.g. magnetic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of fields, specifically magnetic fields, and how they can be described or understood. Participants explore theoretical, conceptual, and mathematical aspects of fields, questioning their composition and the origins of forces associated with them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a field can be described beyond its measurable effects, seeking a deeper understanding of what exists at a point within a magnetic field.
  • There is a debate about the composition of a magnetic field, with some suggesting it is a mathematical construct while others argue it has measurable properties.
  • Participants discuss the classical view that fields are properties of empty space and how changing electric fields produce magnetic fields and vice versa.
  • Some contributions highlight the quantum perspective, noting that the magnetic field of a permanent magnet arises from the aligned spins of electrons, which do not involve movement in the classical sense.
  • Questions arise about the nature of 'spin' and its implications for defining movement and the existence of magnetic fields without changing electric fields.
  • There is a contention regarding the Lorentz force law being a postulate rather than derivable, and the distinction between mathematical models and physical reality is emphasized.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the essence of magnetic fields and the limitations of mathematical descriptions in capturing their nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of magnetic fields, with multiple competing views presented regarding their composition, measurement, and theoretical underpinnings. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing questions and differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of fields, the unresolved nature of the relationship between electric and magnetic fields, and the varying interpretations of quantum mechanics versus classical physics in explaining magnetic phenomena.

  • #31
cabraham said:
That is totally unfair! What makes you think that I'm not trying to expand my knowledge as well as that of mankind?...

First, let me say I was not directing my comment to you personally, but to anyone who thinks we need to stop reaching farther than the doctrines we are fed.

cabraham said:
...The average person does not have the facilities/resources/equipment necessary to answer your question. Only well-funded research labs, universities, and large corporations have the ability to unlock these secrets. ... That would be the opposite of what I want. Peace.
Claude

I have a hard time believing the large research facilities would be the only ones that have a chance discovering these primal forces than anyone with some basic skills and a thinking brain. Choosing to continue with your education after all these years is a good indicator that you are still searching for answers. Maybe you will be the one to discover something previously unknown someday.
Remember Michael Faraday? He was just a blacksmith who was an avid reader and dabbled in experiments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K