What Is a Kahler Manifold?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter s00mb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of Kähler manifolds, exploring their definitions, structures, and relationships with Riemannian and symplectic geometry. Participants seek clarification on the nature of complex structures and their implications within the context of Kähler manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on whether the complex structure J is a subset of the tangent space or the mapping itself, suggesting it could be interpreted as both.
  • Another participant explains that the complex structure J is a mapping from the tangent bundle TM to itself, with properties that preserve the Riemannian metric g.
  • Concerns are raised about the existence of symplectic structures only in odd dimensions, with a participant questioning the necessity of conjugation for symplectic structures.
  • Further clarification is provided that symplectic vector spaces are indeed of even dimension, and the role of the complex structure in calculations is discussed.
  • A participant corrects their earlier statement about dimensionality, distinguishing between symplectic and contact structures.
  • Another participant notes that in a Kähler manifold, the complex structure J, Riemannian metric g, and symplectic form ω are compatible, introducing the concept of an Hermitian metric h.
  • A specific example of a Kähler manifold, the projective space with the Fubini-Study metric, is mentioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the dimensionality of symplectic structures and the necessity of conjugation, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on these points. There is some agreement on the compatibility of structures in Kähler manifolds, but no consensus on the implications of dimensionality.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations regarding the understanding of symplectic structures and their dimensional constraints, as well as the role of complex structures in this context. These aspects remain open for further exploration.

s00mb
Messages
33
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Kahler Manifold question
Hi, I have just finished studying Riemannian Geometry and was moving on to trying to figure out what a Kahler manifold is. Using wikipedia's definition(probably a bad idea to start with) it says "Equivalently, there is a complex structure J on the tangent space of X at each point (that is, a real linear map from TX to itself with J^2 = −1) such that J preserves the metric g (meaning that g(Ju, Jv) = g(u, v)) and J is preserved by parallel transport. " I am not sure what it means by complex structure. Is j a subset of the tangent space with that property or is J the map itself J : TX -> TX with J^2=-1 ? I guess it could kind of be both but I was looking if someone could clarify this for me. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The word complex refers to ##J^2=- id##. Let's list what we have:
  • ##M## is a smooth manifold
  • ##V(M)=\{\,T_pM\,|\,p\in M\,\}## be the space of all smooth vector fields on ##M##
Then we have two functions:
  • ##g\, : \,V(M) \times V(M) \longrightarrow C^\infty(M;\mathbb{R})## a Riemannian metric on ##V(M)\; , \;g(X,Y)(p)=g(X_p,Y_p)##
  • ##J\, : \,TM \longrightarrow TM## a complex structure (a conjugation if you like)##\, : \,J^2(X)=-X##
and a compatibility together with a symplexity condition:
  • ##g(JX,JY)=g(X,Y)## (the complex structure doesn't affect the metric)
  • ##\omega(X,Y)\, := \,g(JX,Y)## is a symplectic form on ##TM##, the Kähler form, i.e. a global, smooth, and closed ##2-##form which is pointwise non degenerated
So all we did is considering an ordinary Riemannian smooth manifold, which has a symplectic structure on its tangent spaces that doesn't change the original Riemannian structure. It is an additional structure. But symplectic means we need a form of conjugation, for otherwise the term would not make sense. It has the same meaning, will say role as the imaginary unit has for symplectic vector spaces. Here our conjugation is called a complex structure, since imaginary would be confusing. It is not a subset, it is a multiplication with a complex unit, a mapping.
 
Last edited:
But a symplectic structure may exist only in odd dimensions on the manifold. Edit: And I don't understand why we need conjugation to make sense of symplectic structures.
 
WWGD said:
But a symplectic structure may exist only in odd dimensions on the manifold. Edit: And I don't understand why we need conjugation to make sense of symplectic structures.
I'm not sure about Kähler manifolds, but symplectic vector spaces are of even dimension!

... because the scalar product is alternating, and the complex structure kind of splits the sign on the two factors. Maybe "need" was a bit too strong, but it helps calculations a lot. Otherwise we would always have to consider the square. Of course one can do analysis on ##\mathbb{R}[x]/\langle x^2+1 \rangle##, but ## i ## makes it easier.
 
fresh_42 said:
I'm not sure about Kähler manifolds, but symplectic vector spaces are of even dimension!

... because the scalar product is alternating, and the complex structure kind of splits the sign on the two factors. Maybe "need" was a bit too strong, but it helps calculations a lot. Otherwise we would always have to consider the square. Of course one can do analysis on ##\mathbb{R}[x]/\langle x^2+1 \rangle##, but ## i ## makes it easier.
I think you mean i make it easier;).
 
Nein mind, I mixed contact with symplectic. Stmplectic is even dimensional while contact is odd dimensional. Edit: you still have the issue of dimensional restrictions; odd instead of even though.
 
Last edited:
Thanks makes sense now :)
 
In a Kähler manifold ##M## the three structures: complex ##J##, Riemannian ##g## and symplectic ##\omega## are compatible in the sense of previous posts ... in fact there is an hermitian metric ##h## on the complex tangent space ##TM## such that ##\omega=\Im{(h)}## and ##g=\Re{(h)}##. A famous Kähler manifold is the projective space ##\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n}## with the Fubini-Study metric ##g_{FS}##.

Ssnow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 156 ·
6
Replies
156
Views
26K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K