MHB What is a velocity field and its relationship to a fluid element's motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Velocity
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let the fluid occupies the space $D \subset \mathbb{R}^n, n=2 \text{ or } 3$.
$\overrightarrow{x}$ is a point of $D$.
We consider the element of the fluid that is at the position $\overrightarrow{x}$ at the time $t$ , and moves along the trajectory $\Gamma$.

View attachment 4404

Let $\overrightarrow{u}(\overrightarrow{x}, t)$ the velocity of this element. For a given time $t$, $\overrightarrow{u}(\cdot , t)$ is a vector field over $D$, and is called velocity field.

Could you explain to me the last part:

"For a given time $t$, $\overrightarrow{u}(\cdot , t)$ is a vector field over $D$, and is called velocity field."

?? (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • fluid.png
    fluid.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 87
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let the fluid occupies the space $D \subset \mathbb{R}^n, n=2 \text{ or } 3$.
$\overrightarrow{x}$ is a point of $D$.
We consider the element of the fluid that is at the position $\overrightarrow{x}$ at the time $t$ , and moves along the trajectory $\Gamma$.



Let $\overrightarrow{u}(\overrightarrow{x}, t)$ the velocity of this element. For a given time $t$, $\overrightarrow{u}(\cdot , t)$ is a vector field over $D$, and is called velocity field.

Could you explain to me the last part:

"For a given time $t$, $\overrightarrow{u}(\cdot , t)$ is a vector field over $D$, and is called velocity field."

?? (Wondering)

Hi! (Blush)

Formally, we would say that the velocity field $\overrightarrow v$ is a function of position to velocity, that is, $\overrightarrow v: D \to \mathbb{R}^n$, given by $\overrightarrow v(\overrightarrow{x}) = \overrightarrow{u}(\overrightarrow{x}, t)$.
The latter can also written as $\overrightarrow v(\cdot) = \overrightarrow{u}(\cdot, t)$, without changing the meaning, where $\cdot$ is an arbitrary symbol. (Nerd)To abbreviate it, we would like to say that $\overrightarrow{u}$ is the velocity field, but that would not be correct, since $\overrightarrow{u}$ takes 2 arguments and we need one argument with a fixed $t$.
So we abbreviate it as $\overrightarrow{u}(\cdot, t)$ with the understanding that $\cdot$ is the placeholder for the implicit argument. (Wasntme)
 
I see... Thanks for the explanation! (flower)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top