What is an Image in Abstract Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bwinter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
Click For Summary
In abstract algebra, an "image" refers to the set of outputs produced by a function mapping elements from one set to another. In the context of the discussion, the function maps from Z5 to Z30, specifically defined as x → 6x, resulting in the image {0, 6, 12, 18, 24}. The term "unity" in this context refers to the multiplicative identity of the image, which is 6, while the unity of Z30 is 1. The confusion arises from the distinction between the identities in different algebraic structures, as the unity of the image is not the same as the unity of Z30. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the relationships between different algebraic systems.
bwinter
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
My professor can't give me a straight answer, the word is absent from the appendix of the book, and google search returns nothing.

So my question is, in the context of abstract algebra...

what the heck is an image?

For example...my book says "Note that the image of the unity is the unity of the image but not the unity of Z30."

What does that mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps this will help you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_(mathematics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks very much for the quick reply. I'm very surprised that didn't come up in my internet search. Seriously, try searching "image abstract algebra" and see what nonsense comes up. Anyway...

So f(x) is the image of x?

So the image of the unity, is f(1).

The unity of the image is the value of x so that f(x) = 1?

And the unity of Z30 is the elements of Z30 under addition such that when one is added to an element of Z30, the same element is returned? Wouldn't that just be {0, 30}?

Please confirm my assumptions here so I know which way is up.
 
Last edited:
Under addition, the image of the unity is f(0)?

I don't think I've ever seen unity to refer to zero, only the multiplicative identity

The unity of the image is the value of x so that f(x) = 1 (under multiplication) and f(x) = 0 (under addition)?

It would help if you tell us exactly what the function is. Certainly f(x) can't be both 1 and 0 at the same time though
 
Sorry, you're right. I get unity and identity blurred together sometimes. The multiplicative identity 1. I edited the post to clarify.

The function is the mapping from Z5 to Z30 given by x --> 6x.
 
So what's happening here is that in Z30, the subset {0,6,12,18,24} (the image of the map) is a ring, with 6 the multiplicative identity. But 6 is not the multiplicative identity of Z30
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
940
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
531
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
878
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K