What is going on with Earth's longwave energy imbalance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnbbahm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Energy
AI Thread Summary
Earth's energy imbalance has increased from 0.5 ± 0.2 Wm−2 to 1.0 ± 0.2 Wm−2 since 2000, primarily due to a rise in absorbed solar radiation (ASR). This increase is partially countered by a rise in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), which is expected to decrease due to added greenhouse gases. However, the relationship between ASR and OLR suggests that even if OLR increases, the net energy imbalance can still lead to warming. The discussion highlights that positive feedback mechanisms in the climate system amplify the initial radiative imbalance, complicating the relationship between greenhouse gas forcing and OLR. Ultimately, the data does not clearly indicate any positive forcing in the longwave spectrum, raising questions about the initial perturbations needed for feedback.
johnbbahm
Messages
306
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
Recorded increase in Outbound Longwave Radiation (OLR) since year 2000.
Observational Assessment of Changes in Earth’s Energy Imbalance Since 2000: 2024
Satellite observations from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System show that Earth’s energy imbalance has doubled from 0.5 ± 0.2 Wm−2 during the first 10 years of this century to 1.0 ± 0.2 Wm−2 during the past decade. The increase is the result of a 0.9 ± 0.3 Wm−2 increase absorbed solar radiation (ASR) that is partially offset by a 0.4 ± 0.25 Wm−2 increase in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR).
Added greenhouse gases are supposed to be decreasing the OLR.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
If the ASR from effective albedo, etc., decreases more than the OLR increases (a natural negative feedback due to the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship) then you still have a net positive energy imbalance, hence net warming.
 
I thought of that also, but for it to be feedback, it has to be feedback from some earlier warming input.
The earlier warming input would have to be forced by an energy imbalance, but if the OLR is increasing,
it cannot be added greenhouse gases that caused the forcing, as their forcing would show up as reduced OLR.
 
Say a “unit” of greenhouse gas forcing temporarily decreases OLR and causes temperatures to rise. Eventually OLR has to catch up and counteract the earlier imbalance; else the system would keep warming indefinitely.

In the real climate system, there are additional positive feedbacks that amplify the “original” radiative imbalance, and hence the OLR has to make up for them as well. That’s why the OLR at later times is not just the same as original but actually larger even though the original forcing initially caused a decrease in OLR.
 
olivermsun said:
Say a “unit” of greenhouse gas forcing temporarily decreases OLR and causes temperatures to rise. Eventually OLR has to catch up and counteract the earlier imbalance; else the system would keep warming indefinitely.

In the real climate system, there are additional positive feedbacks that amplify the “original” radiative imbalance, and hence the OLR has to make up for them as well. That’s why the OLR at later times is not just the same as original but actually larger even though the original forcing initially caused a decrease in OLR.
From the data it is difficult to see if any positive forcing happened at all, in the longwave spectrum. Without the initial perturbation, there would not be anything to feedback upon.
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top