What is Impedence? AC Circuits Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abhishekdas
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of impedance in AC circuits, specifically addressing the relationship between voltage and current as expressed through impedance. The original poster expresses confusion regarding whether the equation V = iZ applies universally or only to RMS and maximum values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions and implications of impedance, questioning whether V = iZ holds for instantaneous values or is limited to RMS values. There are discussions about the nature of complex voltage and current, and how they relate to impedance in AC circuits.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, providing insights into the relationship between complex numbers and impedance. Some have offered clarifications on the use of complex voltage and current, while others express a need for further understanding and resources to grasp the material better.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of familiarity with complex equations and seeks additional resources to aid their understanding of the topic. There is an acknowledgment of varying levels of comprehension among participants regarding the mathematical aspects of impedance.

Abhishekdas
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
WHat is impedence...?

Homework Statement


This is really confusing me...In my book it is mentioned that in Ac circuits Vrms=irmsZ and Vmax=imaxZ where i and V are current and Voltage respectively...And it is also mentioned that in LCR ac circuits impedence act as ohmic resistors in dc circuits...Now my doubt is very simple...Is V always equal to iZ or is it true only for the rms and maximum values...

Looking forward to some help...thank you...



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


When i flipped a few pages back for a recap i saw that the impedence derivations for different circuits and for eg in an LR cicuits they are saying that V=Vr + jVL...Here VL and VR stands for PD across Inductor and Resistor...NNow jVl has been replaced by jiwL...but V isn't always equal to iwl...because in inductor circuits in ac the voltage leads current by 90 degrees...SO all along are we always dealing with rms values? and so if V=iZ assuming rms values of i and Z or for instantaneous values also(which is my orginal question)...? it doesn't seem true for instantaneous values though...
 


Just as when a circuit settles into steady state you have DC equations involving resistance
V=iR
when a circuit has settled into a sinusoidal periodic state you have AC equations involving impedance.
V= iZ
Here you are expressing complex voltage and complex current. The complex value is simply a means of combining in phase and out of phase components:
V = V_0 e^{j\omega t} = V_0[\cos(\omega t) + j\sin(\omega t)]
(note V_0 is also complex valued!)
The actual voltage at a given instant is the real component, but that initial voltage is also complex so this will be:
\Re(V)=\Re(V_0) \cos(\omega t) -\Im(V_0)\sin(\omega t)
Likewise with complex current.

Now understanding this complex format you can express the cyclic AC relationship between current and voltage using complex Impedance in place of DC's real Resistance.
Z=R+jX
So yes, it is not just the r.m.s. value but the complex value at any instant which satisfies:
V = iZ

To get the physical voltage and current take real components... but notice that with complex impedance the real voltage will be proportional to both real and imaginary components of current, and vice versa.

The r.m.s. values come from averaging the square of the real component over a cycle and taking the square root, "root mean square" but will in the sinusoidal AC case simply be sqrt(2)/2 times the magnitude of the complex value.

So the r.m.s. equation should read:
V_{rms} =i_{rms}|Z| =i_{rms} \sqrt{R^2 + X^2}
where |Z| is the magnitude of the complex impedance. The difference between using Z and |Z| should be glaring since Z is complex while the r.m.s. values are real values.

Finally, note that once you have the behavior of circuits for sinusoidal periodic cases of various frequencies, you can then analyze transient behavior using Fourier analysis.
 
Hi Abhishekdas! :smile:
Abhishekdas said:
Is V always equal to iZ or is it true only for the rms and maximum values...

Abhishekdas said:
...SO all along are we always dealing with rms values? and so if V=iZ assuming rms values of i and Z or for instantaneous values also(which is my orginal question)...? it doesn't seem true for instantaneous values though...

Complex V always equals complex I times Z.

Here's some notes I was making on impedance …​

Complex voltage and current:

In a steady sinusoidal (AC) circuit of frequency \omega, the (instantaneous) voltage and current V\text{ and }I can always be written:
V =\ V_x\cos\omega t + V_y\sin\omega t and I =\ I_x\cos\omega t + I_y\sin\omega t​

Then the complex voltage and complex current between any two points are the constants defined as \bold{V} =\ V_x+jV_y\text{ and }\bold{I} =\ I_x+jI_y.

The complex number Z =\ \bold{V}/\bold{I} is called the impedance between those two points.​

Similarly, dV/dt\text{ and }dI/dt can always be written:
dV/dt =\ V'_x\cos\omega t + V'_y\sin\omega t and dI/dt =\ I'_x\cos\omega t + I'_y\sin\omega t​

Then the complex voltage derivative and complex current derivative between any two points are constants defined as \bold{V}' =\ V'_x + jV'_y\text{ and }\bold{I}' =\ I'_x + jI'_y.

Obviously, V'_x\ =\ \omega V_y\text{ and }V'_y\ =\ -\omega V_x, and so \bold{V}' = j\omega\bold{V}. Similarly \bold{I}' = j\omega\bold{I}.

Resistors capacitors and inductors:

For ordinary voltage and current, Ohm's Law, and the capacitor and inductor laws, state:
V =\ RI,\ \ \ dV/dt =\ I/C,\ \ \ V =\ LdI/dt​

For complex voltage and current, these become:
\bold{V} =\ R\bold{I},\ \ \ \bold{V}' =\ \bold{I}/C,\ \ \ \bold{V} =\ L\bold{I}'​
which can be rewritten without the derivatives as the fundamental complex rules:
\bold{V} =\ R\bold{I},\ \ \ \bold{V} =\ \bold{I}/j\omega C,\ \ \ \bold{V} =\ j\omega L\bold{I}​

In other words: the impedance across a resistor capacitor and inductor are:
Z =\ R,\ \ \ Z =\ 1/j\omega C,\ \ \ Z =\ j\omega L​

In a varying sinusoidal (AC) circuit of (fixed) frequency \omega, the coefficients V_x\ V'_x\ V_y\ V'_y\ I_x\ I'_x\ I_y\text{ and }I'_y are not constants, and the fundamental rules become:


\bold{V} =\ R\bold{I},\ \ \ j\omega C\bold{V} + Cd\bold{V}/dt =\ \bold{I},\ \ \ \bold{V} =\ j\omega L\bold{I} + Ld\bold{I}/dt​

This can be dealt with by replacing the fixed real frequency \omega by a complex "s-plane" (Laplace transform) frequency s


Complex power:

Power = work per time = voltage times charge per time = voltage times current:

P = VI =\ V_{max}I_{max}\cos(\omega t + \phi/2)\cos(\omega t - \phi/2)
=\ V_{max}I_{max}(\cos\phi + \cos2\omega t)/2
=\ V_{rms}I_{rms}(\cos\phi + \cos2\omega t)​

So the average power is the constant part, V_{rms}I_{rms}\cos\phi, to which is added a component varying with double the circuit frequency, V_{rms}I_{rms}\cos2\omega t (so a graph of the whole power is a sine wave shifted by a ratio \cos\phi above the x-axis).
 


Thank you guys ...both of you...
So basically in complex form V=IZ always...ok...
But you know what i am not excatly getting whatever you guys wrote involving complex numbers and stuff and in my book they have given a very brief part on the complex equations... I mean i am pretty much and amature in this chapter...So please don't mind about the face that i did not get it that much...but you when i go furthur into the chapter i guess i will get back to you...But before that i need to refer to some good physics books to get these things...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
19
Views
6K