What is Leakage in terms of quantum computing?

Click For Summary
Leakage in quantum computing refers to the phenomenon where qubits, which are expected to exist only in two states (|0⟩ and |1⟩), inadvertently transition to additional states (like |2⟩), leading to errors. This leakage can cause time-correlated errors in qubits that interact with the affected qubits, complicating error correction efforts. Despite the challenges posed by leakage, research indicates that a threshold error rate can still be maintained, although overall performance is significantly impacted. Implementing additional quantum circuitry during the error detection cycle can help restore acceptable performance levels. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that qubits may not behave as ideal two-level systems, which can undermine the effectiveness of traditional error-correcting codes.
David Long
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am doing a project on stabilizer code, and I keep running into a term about qubits and leakage. What does leakage mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.6642

Abstract said:
Many physical systems considered promising qubit candidates are not, in fact, two-level systems. Such systems can leak out of the preferred computational states, leading to errors on any qubits that interact with leaked qubits. Without specific methods of dealing with leakage, long-lived leakage can lead to time-correlated errors. We study the impact of such time-correlated errors on topological quantum error correction codes, which are considered highly practical codes, using the repetition code as a representative case study. We show that, under physically reasonable assumptions, a threshold error rate still exists, however performance is significantly degraded. We then describe simple additional quantum circuitry that, when included in the error detection cycle, restores performance to acceptable levels.
 
It means that your qubit, which should only allow ##|0\rangle## and ##|1\rangle## states, has ended up in an extra ##|2\rangle## state (or higher) inherent to the physical system you implemented the qubit in. This tends to be very bad, because it consistently propagates errors into adjacent qubits interacting with the qubit in the ##|2\rangle## state. Also, error correcting codes tend to be designed under the assumption that qubits are not secretly qutrits.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K