What is more reactive carbon or phosphor

  • Thread starter Thread starter taregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reactivity of carbon versus phosphorus, with a focus on their stability at standard temperature and pressure (STP). It is established that phosphorus, often confused with "phosphor," is less stable than carbon under these conditions. Additionally, sulfur and nitrogen are compared, with sulfur being less stable than nitrogen at STP. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relative free energy of reactants and products in determining reactivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic knowledge of General Chemistry concepts
  • Understanding of standard temperature and pressure (STP) conditions
  • Familiarity with chemical stability and reactivity
  • Knowledge of free energy in chemical reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Wikipedia articles on "Carbon" and "Phosphorus" for foundational knowledge
  • Study the principles of chemical stability and reactivity
  • Learn about free energy and its role in chemical reactions
  • Explore the properties of sulfur and nitrogen in comparison to other nonmetals
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in the comparative reactivity of nonmetals, particularly carbon, phosphorus, sulfur, and nitrogen.

taregg
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
also what is more reactive sulfur or nitrogen. ...
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
what make depends nonmetals to be reactive
 
A phosphor is a material which can emit emr at a frequency different from the frequency it is absorbing it at.
If you are not a fluent English speaker, you should check your spelling and meaning before posting.
I assume you meant phosphorous.
Do you mean which chemical element, carbon or phosphorous, is most stable at STP? I suggest you learn some General Chemistry before posting here, this is not the forum to teach you chemistry (or English). A good place for you to start is to read Wikipedia on Carbon and Phosphorous (etc.). Both N and S are found elementally, but S is not stable elementally at STP over the long term. The answer to your third question is: their nature. More precisely, the relative free energy of the products compared to that of the reactants. I am sorry if this answer means nothing to you, you need to be able to walk before you can run.
 

Similar threads

Chemistry: Electron Configurations & Reactivity
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Why does having 8 valence electrons make an element inert?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
927
Benzyl Chloride Reactivity: Examining Stability & Rate
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Active ingredients in carbon deposit solvent
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Why Does Reactivity Differ in Group 7?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why do the d, f orbitals of transition metals have less reactivity?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Hybridization of atoms in heterocyclic compounds
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Negative Charge Stability: Oxygen vs. Carbon/Nitrogen
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Extremely hydrogenated carbon compounds
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Oxidation number of carbon in (NH4)2C2O4
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K