What is the acceleration of a falling object from a balloon?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a hot-air balloon ascending at a constant rate of 12 m/s from a height of 80 m when a package is dropped. Participants explore the implications of the balloon's motion on the package's descent, particularly focusing on the time it takes for the package to reach the ground and its impact velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to relate the balloon's constant velocity to the package's motion after it is dropped, questioning how the balloon's ascent affects the package's initial conditions. Some participants explore different kinematic equations to find the time of descent and final velocity of the package.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the initial conditions of the package, particularly its initial upward velocity and how it transitions to free fall. Participants are actively questioning assumptions about acceleration and the effects of gravity on the package's motion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the problem and the application of kinematic equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the implications of the balloon's constant velocity and the initial conditions of the package. There is some confusion regarding the signs of acceleration and the interpretation of upward versus downward motion in the context of the problem.

  • #31
SteamKing said:
I think here, instead of introducing spurious negative signs, it would be better to use g = -9.8 m/s2 along with the distance fallen of -87.347 m.
v02 still comes out positive.

But won't it be imaginary since ##v_0## is still negative?

SteamKing said:
The change in position will also be negative since the package was 87.347 m above the ground before it fell.

But then you'd have to move the negative displacement to the other side, making it positive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well, anyway, thank you so much for everything. You and everyone have been a big help to me with my self-study. Without this forum, I don't believe I would be able to learn physics on my own. So... thank you. :)
 
  • #33
Eclair_de_XII said:
But won't it be imaginary since ##v_0## is still negative?

The equation is v2 = u2 + 2 a s

There is no negative sign on the velocity terms. The product of -9.8 and -87.347 is also positive.

But then you'd have to move the negative displacement to the other side, making it positive.

Not if you take x = 0 being the ground and x0 = 87.347 m as the height from which the package started falling. Here, v0 = 0 and g = -9.8 m/s2, making the equation:

x - x0 = v0 t + (1/2)*g*t2 → 0 - 87.347 = (1/2) * (-9.8) * t2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K