What is the approximate weight of a 20.kg rock

  • Thread starter vaironl
  • Start date
  • #1
34
0
Since it has a decimal it would be 20kg * 9.8m/s which equals 196kg m/s^2 = 196N

But the decimal means i have to round two sig figs, which would make it 200N?

A very simple problem, I really don't know why I'm asking it.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
251
  • #3
34
0
hi vaironl! :smile:

do you mean 20.0 kg ?

if so, that's three significant figures :wink:
Thanks for the reply, tim. "And let me say, that is a big post count"

My paper says 20.kg so I'm rounding to two significant figures. Am I right?
 
  • #4
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
251
i've no idea what "20.kg" means :redface:

i understand "20 kg" and "20.0 kg", but i've never seen "20.kg" or even "20. kg" :confused:
 
  • #5
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
16
Yes that is correct. When you see things like 20.kg, it means that the 0 is significant. If it were simply 20kg without the decimal, that would mean the number is only accurate to 1 significant figure. If, as tiny-tim advised, it were 20.0 kg, it would mean the second 0 is significant as well and there are 3 significant figures to take into account.

So your answer is 200N, accurate to 2 significant figures.

Scientific notation is really great because it clears these kind of odd notations. 20kg to 2 significant figures in SI notation would be 2.0 x 10^1 kg, clearly showing the 0 is significant.
 
  • #6
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
251
ah! thanks, Pengwuino! :smile:
 
  • #7
34
0
i've no idea what "20.kg" means :redface:

i understand "20 kg" and "20.0 kg", but i've never seen "20.kg" or even "20. kg" :confused:
Yes that is correct. When you see things like 20.kg, it means that the 0 is significant. If it were simply 20kg without the decimal, that would mean the number is only accurate to 1 significant figure. If, as tiny-tim advised, it were 20.0 kg, it would mean the second 0 is significant as well and there are 3 significant figures to take into account.

So your answer is 200N, accurate to 2 significant figures.

Scientific notation is really great because it clears these kind of odd notations. 20kg to 2 significant figures in SI notation would be 2.0 x 10^1 kg, clearly showing the 0 is significant.
Thanks, I knew something was going wrong. My teacher usually does things like that.
I can't believe sometimes he even gets about 3-6 problems incorrectly which demonstrates unprofessional work ethic.
 

Related Threads on What is the approximate weight of a 20.kg rock

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
38K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
52K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
21K
Replies
4
Views
831
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top