MHB What is the area of the quadrilateral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monokonos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
The quadrilateral KLMN is inscribed in a circle with center O, where KL measures 18 and LM measures 24, with KN equal to NM. The area of triangle KLM is calculated as 216, while triangle KNM, being isosceles with base KM as 30 and height ON as 15, has an area of 225. The total area of quadrilateral KLMN is thus the sum of the areas of both triangles, which equals 441. The use of the Pythagorean theorem and properties of inscribed angles were key in determining these areas. The discussion highlights the geometric relationships within the quadrilateral and the circle.
Monokonos
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 7882
https://gyazo.com/55afe69c0f00bff85a3a9c53bd353b42

Sorry for the really poorly drawn and lit picture...

Basically this quadrilateral is drawn inside a circle whose middle point is O. Here is the info I was given

KL = 18
LM = 24
KN = NM

What I need to find out is the area of KLMN.

What I did there split the quadrilateral into 2 with a diameter. I found out the length of that with the pythagorean theorem. It was 30. So logically the area of that triangle is 24x18/2 = 225.

But how do I find out the volume of the second triangle? I know it's really simple but I just can't figure it out...
 

Attachments

  • 55afe69c0f00bff85a3a9c53bd353b42.jpg
    55afe69c0f00bff85a3a9c53bd353b42.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 149
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If KM is a diameter, then triangle KNM is isosceles with base KM = 30 and height ON = 15 $\implies$ area of triangle KNM is 225.

triangle KLM is inscribed in a semicircle, therefore angle L is 90 degrees ...

area of triangle KLM is 216
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Back
Top